Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-24/Skutt suit

Article history deletion

Might want to mention that the history of the article before July 22, including all the possibly defamatory stuff, has now been deleted from Wikipedia. Oddly, a 02:59, 11 July 2006 version of the article, which does not contain any negative material but is longer than the current stub, is still available in the Google cache. Oh, the article is now semi-protected. Don't know if you want to mention that, because it's immediately obvious. Casey Abell 16:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And it was me who performed the recent deletion and I was the one who performed the protection of the page. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 01:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IPs involved

I think that it is more likely that the other IP besides 68.96.26.20 that is involved is 68.99.30.137, rather than 68.107.235.103. It made very similar edits to 68.96.26.20 and the comments were worse. I probably would have just said two IPs rather than identifying them (no offense to Michael :-) ), but if they are mentioned, I think it should be accurate. -- Kjkolb 10:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the structure of the article, it seemed that the first quoted passage, from 68.107.235.103, came from one of the IPs identified in the lawsuit. It's possible that is not the case, and if so I would agree with your analysis of the likely candidates. While some inference is required, I wanted to make clear, without republishing the allegations themselves, that there is more involved in the case than commentary about exorbitant tuition. --Michael Snow 17:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]