Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-24/Interwiki report

This may not be published this week. If it isn't I think it will published next week. I asked Michael a few minutes ago. Tree bark (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

would be stupid, cause it contains the events of last week. You'd have to rewrite it almost completely if you want to publish it next week. --Elian ^Talk 15:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The German stuff is good enough—excellent, actually—and I'm happy to run it. The other stuff was only partly useful and brief enough that it was better off in News and notes (sorry, but a list of things that didn't happen is not really news). Hopefully this can inspire reports of a similar nature from other projects and maybe we can rotate between them or something. --Michael Snow 18:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool

I really enjoyed reading about what the German wikipedia is getting up to! - Ta bu shi da yu 09:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I wonder if this type of thing could be expanded beyond just the German Wikipedia... I mean, the fourth-biggest Wikipedia is the Polish one: surely outside the radar of the vast majority of English-speakers. What's going on in the French wikipedia? In the Chinese one, which is blocked in China? In the Dutch? zafiroblue05 | Talk 22:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Next week were doing the French Wikipedia. Tree bark (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, has someone agreed to do it? There is some discussion at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions#Regular Feature. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ral said one report would be fine. See User talk:Treebark#Signpost 2 T®ee bark (talk) 21:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Were doing Polish as you can see at WP:SIGN/N/O and you can look at the second special story which is a report from the Polish Wikipedia. T®ee bark (talk) 21:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]