Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-24/Country blocking

Hello, About blocking Wikipedia in Suadia Arabia, yes it's true. I work in the Arabic Wikipedia and our Saudi colleagues there mentioned this several times. I just wanted to mention that Arab News is a not trustiful resource of information. It is a tabloid newspapers depends on using slang unpolite arabic and to show scandal images. Most of their news come from their own reporter and not from the international news agencies.

Best Regards --Oxydo 08:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ohps, I think I made a mistake. I meant above Arab Times and not as mentioned in the article Arab News. Apologies. --Oxydo 08:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the confirmation. I admit that there's only so much I can do to check the information, which is why the story is heavy on the "According to..." approach, but it seemed trustworthy and checked out to the extent that I was able. --Michael Snow 15:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India

I think that there is no instance of wikipedia being blocked in India. I am sure that it would never happen in India. There is a lot of differences in the rights which citizens have in India, and in some other nearby countries who do not have a democratic set up of governments. --Bhadani 12:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it wouldn't, either. It's at least conceivable, and given the circumstances, I thought the recent events with blogs in India were worth mentioning. The story does point out the absence of reports of India blocking Wikipedia, just in case anyone gets confused. --Michael Snow 01:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]