Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-12/In the news

Only positive articles are now being reported by the Signpost - Xed 20:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Take a look at this story just the week before. If there are any omissions, you're welcome to call them to our attention; the brevity of the coverage is mostly just because Catherine wasn't able to help out this time as she usually does. --Michael Snow 20:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how you could have missed [1] and [2]. An article by the former editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica, Robert McHenry, seems to me more important than a unknown columnist describing her first impressions of Wikipedia. - Xed 08:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article referred to by Seattle Post

The Seattle Post referred to an article on Brian Haberstroh. I had a bit of a look at the article's edit history, and I've mentioned on the talk page that I'm worried that the article may have been edited by a pro-spam anonymous IP - possibly the spammer his/herself. Would anyone be able to give a second opinion? Andjam 11:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]