Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-05/Indianapolis Star

I read the Indianapolis Star article days ago and I thought it was fair to positive. Saying it "slams" Wikipedia is not neutral of correct, but rather it is tabloid style overstatement. Chicheley 14:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that better? -- backburner001 15:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Business coverage and notability

The frustrating thing about trying to improve coverage of individual businesses is that too many editors want to delete articles on businesses as either not notable or as advertising when neither is the case, so contributors quickly learn not to waste their time writing articles that are just going to be deleted, or that will take more time to argue about in AfD than to write. If improving business coverage is a priority, then notability for businesses will have to be redefined more loosely. 16:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC) TruthbringerToronto 16:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the case. All a person has to do is to write the article so as to indicate its notability, not making it a glowing ad extolling the features of the product or the company, but expalin its significance. See WP:CORP. User:Zoe|^(talk) 16:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]