Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women/Team Nigeria/Contests

Results not announced

The results of the contest isn't being announced. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willybeez (talk • contribs) 08:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only short stubs allowed

I see that only short stubs or missing articles are permitted, but in browsing through the Nigerian actresses category most work needs to go into article despamming and cleanup. there's a lot of articles which are beyond a short stub or even start class which contain unsourced poorly written text or bad sourcing/bare URLs. I think you should probably permit those too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: All kinds of contributions are welcome! Just that, for the contests, priority would be given to creating new articles or improving short stubs. However, any significant contribution is appreciated and will be recognized, if the Jury considers such contribution to be significant enough. I will try to include this piece of information on the contest page. Thanks a lot for your interest in these contests. It is appreciated! :). --Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jamie Tubers. Out of curiosity how much are the prizes for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place? If it was something specific and a value attached to a certain thing I'd be more likely to contribute myself. Like a reward for whoever expands the most Nigerian women entertainer stubs in a month, or cleans up the most articles etc. Another thing, how do you define "short stubs". Under 0.5 kb of readable prose in total? There are of course much longer stubs which are equally as useless if poorly written and sources and needing restarting. I think perhaps if you attached a prize to "Whoever expands and improves the most " articles you might see more articles produced. If there was say a reward for $200 for whoever destubs/cleanups the most articles I'd try to compete myself ;-) Also how is "best" articles defined? It is the single best article, the best articles produced overall, and how do you define that, is it longest expansion, highest quality prose and research, biggest improvement overall? etc. If there's hundreds of articles produced, isn't judging that tough? Also what about scope, what article categories are included in the "entertainers" category. Perhaps you could put up the categories on the main page which fall under the scope you're looking for, presumably actresses, directors, dancers, TV presenters, singers, musicians but there might be others too, women magicians, circus performers etc?. Another thing I think is that some Nigerian entertainers are more important than others. If there's say 25 high importance/core articles the Jury would love to see on the most famous entertainers brought up to Wikipedia:Good article status, perhaps those could be listed on the main page and the editor who improves the most of them given extra kudos towards overall improvements or something. Just some ideas, it's your contest ;-).

BTW, to gain more publicity you could ask User:Casliber to put up a central notice for this so thousands of wikipedians worldwide can know about it and you might attract more contributors! Good luck with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With only three participants at the moment (including the organizer), the priority seems to be to ensure more interest. Why not send the contest notice to all relevant WikiProjects, especially all those related to women? You could also notify the participants in WiR Women in Entertainment. --Ipigott (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott:, thanks for your support and participation in our contest. I think, what we need at the moment is publicity. I have done mass message to host of wikipedians but it seems we need more. I wouldn't mind if we could use central notice for publicity in order top attract more contestants.Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Olaniyan Olushola: I have already suggested to Rosiestep that we should send out details of the contest via the Women in Red mass messaging list. You might also like to inform all those on the additional list I prepared for our editathon Women in Entertainment: User:Ipigott/Women in Entertainment editathon invitations.--Ipigott (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Thanks, i will work on the list. I have contacted @Romaine: to put up cenral notice for the contest.Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would also suggest putting up a notice in "Projects needing help" in Wikipedia:Community portal and mentioning it at the village pump. It might help though if we know what the prizes are because you can then advertise it as "win xxx for producing the best articles on Nigerian women from Sep 20th-.."♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: there are no monetary prizes for these contests, as Wikipedia is projected as a volunteers community, and paying contestants goes against the paid-editing policy. Rewards will be inform of barnsters, just like the "Wiki Loves Nigeria" contest.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 12:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamie Tubers: Contests with monetary prizes have been held on here for years, Wikipedia:The Core Contest was one of the earliest to do it in around 2007 or 2008. And it's something Wikimedia supports where prizes are in the form of Amazon vouchers which editors in turn can use to buy books to further contribute to the project, so certainly not paid editing in terms of cash for "paid advocacy" or the terms of what the site frowns upon. They work brilliantly in getting content improved which otherwise would not be edited in years. I've run Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon and Wikipedia:The West Country Challenge already this year with £250 for each in prizes and in total have produced over 1500 article improvements. A lot of content was created by people joining in the spirit of it, rather than money oriented, but it served to be really productive with a mechanism to get people working on important areas like core articles or cleanup.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC) @Dr. Blofeld: thanks for the information about "pay editing". In as much as we may like your suggestion.It will be difficult from our side because we didn't plan for it from the onset.Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion. Some increased signposting is required. I came to the project page overleaf but it doesnt give me a red list, a list of participants, articles so far etc. I know that the list of participants is around but if the mass messaging does bring editors in then they need to be able to find these pages. Where is the articles so far? I wanted to tweet these links... Victuallers (talk) 11:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Victuallers:, i am afraid to see that the mass message didnt produce much effect.We will really appreciate your suggestion in whatever capacity to help in announcing the contest. Thanks Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hope it improves - Im on holiday for week so not much help im afraid Victuallers (talk) 12:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've returned - I have spent 20 mins or so finding this page and I still cannot find the list of articles that Dr B had and I added Chigul to before I went on holiday. "Pages that link" to Chiguul doesnt find it. I have created some new pictures but don't know where to list them. I think its an error not to use the WiR project page as that is found by google searching. If you try and google search for this page then you find project pages for previous pages and no link to here. (surprise! Victuallers (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

@Victuallers and Casliber: the comment above is not signed, so i don't know whether its for either of you.There are specific template needed for the collation of all the articles for this contest. It seems they were not use on the article. Now, i have added them to the talk page of Chigul.Please list all the pictures in common under the category:Images from Wiki Loves Women in Nigeria.Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 01:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Im on holiday for week so not much help im afraid .... Ive returned. Same person maybe? I may add images to this category-but I'm not sure the comments here are being understood. Victuallers (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

Just some thoughts I have - when I edit articles outside my main areas of editing, the task becomes much harder and more time consuming. Hence I really don't think there is much interest in narrowly focussed contests. The best hope is to have a broad contest and attract alot of people. Hence I think the best thing to do is a scope as large as Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon and see how that works. Furthermore, when I revived some contests (Wikipedia:The Core Contest and Wikipedia:Stub Contest), I felt it was necessary to have some token reward, which is why I got amazon vouchers as they are not cash but widely useable across the planet. I thought it'd be great if folks were able to get a free book or two out of it, all in the name of learning. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

There seems to be an issue with quality sourcing for a lot of Nigerian actresses. I just created a stub Queeneth Agbor for instance as a test. Most of the sources repeat the same thing "she agrees with sex before marriage". Could find very little actually about her career to the point people could question its notability. How can you write quality articles without quality sources?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I actually doubt her notability myself. I've never heard of her before. I don't think there would be any sourcing problems for actresses that are actually notable. That's why we are starting with entertainment, since establishing notability is much easier.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was on your red list for the contest. I checked a few of the others and found similar lack of sourcing. Happy to help contribute articles on Nigerian entertainers but have no idea where I'm supposed to post my articles, I don't see a page for the contestants.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Post the articles in the suggestion page, if they aren't there already. You're also free to sign next to the links to show that they were created by you. However, this is not necessary, as it is easy to always check who created which article.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create a page for Entries instead and just move the list that was started there? It makes it very difficult to track what I've done and remain motivated on this otherwise! I'd rather create a neat list filed all under my user name if this is possible. Also I've started entries not on the suggestions page which are notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't want to split information in too many places, as it maybe too difficult to manage in the long run, since we'll be running 6 consecutive contests for 6 months. Just sign next to the articles you have created on the suggestion page. That way you can still monitor your progress.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but we also don't want to bloat the suggestion mage with dozens of signatures! Potentially editors could further improve the same articles, what then? I would think one page would be really convenient, Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves Women /Team Nigeria/Contests/Entries, split that page into 6, one for each of your contests. :

==1: Entertainment==

===Victuallers===

Entries:

===Dr. Blofeld===

Entries:

===Darreg===

Entries:

==2: Next month focus==

===Victuallers===

Entries:

and so on.

I've created User:Dr. Blofeld/Nigeria. I'll list all my entries there as it's much easier to keep a neat list for, you're welcome to use whatever you like towards the contest. I will try to add a note on your suggestions page to mark ones I've done too though if you would find that helpful.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maheeda and Cossy Ejiofor

I don't know if I should go ahead and create articles for these two ladies. I added them to my ToDo list from the article suggestion page because I find their lifestyle eccentric and somewhat interesting to me. Let me start with Maheeda, she claims to be a musician, and has released a couple of un-notable songs. Her rise to popularity is in the fact that she frequently shares unclad pictures on instagram. This has made notable newspapers to be monitoring her lifestyle. There are reliable sources that cover her but she doesn't have a noble or notable profession. As for Cossy, she claims to be an actress and have had minor roles in a couple of notable films. She has also featured and starred in some un-notable films. Her rise to popularity is in the fact that her breast size are far above the average. She also enjoys displaying them at events, this has made media houses and the entire populace to have a keen interest in her, and thus began monitoring her lifestyle. My question is at what point does GNG alone truly apply to a BLP. Darreg (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe these two people are notable, based on Wikipedia guidelines. They do not really need to do "anything in particular" according to you. There are tons of articles on wikipedia about people who are just socialites, and nothing else. These kinda subjects belong to the Famous for being famous category. lol--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. The introductory text will be quite funny. Cossy Ejiofor is a Nigerian actress and video vixen. She is widely known for displaying her huge breast during social events or Maheeda is a Nigerian singer. She rose to prominence after sharing series of unclad pictures on Instagram. I will work on their articles towards the end of this contest. For now I want to concentrate on "serious" entertainers. Last question. Does sport fall under entertainment? There are a couple of female sportplayers I'd work on next. Darreg (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For some reasons, I started something in my sandbox. Will do cleanup and add more content and references in the next few days. Darreg (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sportswomen are not included in this contest. It's probably an area we'll touch in subsequent contests.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]