Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject West Virginia/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Suggestion to pull this project under WikiProject United States

It was recently suggested that this project might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there is some active discussions on the talk page and some content updates to the project page but being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project members are interested in the project being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. --Kumioko (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I support the decision (as you already know). The parent project could be very beneficial on helping improve articles to GA, A, and FA standard. -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 17:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to comment. I will send an individual comment to each of the active editors of the project in the next day or two. --Kumioko (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree that support by the larger WPUS base would be beneficial. We haven't had any big work pushes with WPWV for quite some time. Bitmapped (talk) 19:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Just for everyones info I am going to leave this open for a couple weeks but if there are no major concerns or complaints I will implement sometime the end of July. --Kumioko (talk) 20:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I also support this suggestion. This project has barely been active since I joined, and it could only improve with the support of the larger US project. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 22:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I support this suggestion. Alot of times this project feels weeks from dead. Sabre ball (talk) 11:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
This project has been added to the list of projects support by WikiProject United States. Over the next couple weeks I will transition the articles to use the WPUS banner with WikiProject West Virginia. --Kumioko (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Hopefully it will help the project. Is there anything I can do? -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 23:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I hope so too. I appreciate it but I can't think of anything off hand. I am going to use AWB to replace the templates so that should go pretty quick although there are quite a few so it may take a couple days. You are welcome to help with that if you want. --Kumioko (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
So what does it mean when it becomes supported by WikiProject United States? Would WikiProject West Virginia become a task force under WP:United States? Or would it just be marked as defunct and all articles absorbed into WP:United States? Royalbroil 15:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Neither, The project will still remain independant for the most part. Its true that the West Virginia Banner will be replaced with WPUS with the West Virginia embedded in it but the articles are shared between the 2 projects. Its not an effort to defunct the project or too make it a task force. Its an effort to make sure that the articles recieve some visibility and too revive this WPWV by giving it more visibility through the larger project. --Kumioko (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Do I need to change the project banner on the project page? It still has the old project one on it. -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 15:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes you can do that if you like. Thank you. --Kumioko (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

What about WikiProject West Virginia University? I think it should be pulled under WikiProject West Virginia and WikiProject United States since it is completely inactive since it has never been added to the WikiProject United States banner. I don't want convert WikiProject West Virginia into a task force of WikiProject United States any time soon, West Virginia University WikiProject should be converted into a task force of WikiProject West Virginia, because it has only 6 members and no guidelines, and no articles. If not, I will take this to WP:MFD if there is no activty and little discussion on the project's talk page. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 08:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Just to calrify West Virginia isn't a taskforce of United States its just supported by United States the United States banner. With that said I'm not sure if there is much value in adding WVU to the list of supported projects. I don't have a problem with it per sey but with the limited scope of the project and given that it has zero articles and is inactive I don't think there is much value in it. I also checked its history and it appears that there never was that much activity so it doesn't really look like it ever got off the ground. In muy opinion if you want to submit it for MFD that would be fine. If it ends up being kept then we can talk about what to do with it. --Kumioko (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

For WV baseball people.

A proposal has been made to delete all Pittsburgh Pirates rivalry articles save Phillies-Pirates. I am posting this for West Virginia since MLB territory as well as the Designated Market Area extends into much of West Virginia. If you have viewpoints on whether to merge/keep/delete and facts/citations to justify it please comment here. Thanks for your participation. Hholt01 (talk) 09:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Someone from West Virginia might have better access to sources for this article. I discovered the Whitakers and thought that the family as a whole deserved an article, as they seemed to have been important as an interlinked family business for many years, as well as individually. Brianyoumans (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Image deletion discussion

Relevant deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_30#File:WestVirginiahelmet.png.--GrapedApe (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:West Virginia will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in West Virginia's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposal for United States A-Class review process

There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Steeler Nation Criticism

NOTE: The source of this discussion specifically mentions West Virginia, thus inclusion here.

McClintic Wildlife Management Area

Hello, could anyone here get hold of a picture of the McClintic Wildlife Management Area just outside Point Pleasant, Mason County? At the moment, the article is illustrated with a generic picture of a beaver. Thanks. Sophie means wisdom (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

DO we have a standard for WV Counties?????

OK, I tried to start a central discussion with arcane code that really is about as user friendly as a serial killer. so, I will try this here. The current County template looky looky is great, in fact, its very good. BUT, it needs to reflect some comments or have some sort of flesh to inform people of what should and should NOT be in a county article. Example, Notable residents, WHERE do they go? I am not going to debate, Notable, OH NO, I am stating, that it needs a section on the template. Also, if the "Notable person" has no citation on the web, in Wiki or in a book, do we delete them?

Second part, its great to have new structures/buildings discussed, but, can we all agree, that the NEW WALMART! or the NEW TACO BELL! should not be in the county article???? ALSO, listing phone numbers and county officials without refs, can we comment the template with something like, PLEASE do not list phone numbers, PLEASE cite the facts and figures discussed......We have new folks here who have NO idea about this, and thats fine, BUT a template that lists this, would be great for the experienced editors and the new person. For those of us who have coded, we called these fine things COMMENTS.

PLEASE let me know what it would take to be an agreement on this? OR should I just edit the proposed template on [this page myself and let the world moan and groan about it post fact, because lets face it, someone will object, hey, I think I will do that!Coal town guy (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

A proposed county template

Below is a proposed county template. It is cased upon the rather mercurial editings I have performed in my first year here in Wiki land...I expect rebuttal etc etc PLEASE do let me know.Coal town guy (talk) 02:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


[[Template:Infobox U.S. County]] (See example use in the [[Prince George's County, Maryland]] article.)

_ is a [[county (US)|county]] in the [[U.S. state]] of [[_]].<!--Change the language here to X is a county in the US state of y-->

Introductory paragraph.


<!--Founding date WITH a ref. A curious fact, or something unique, this was named after the 
wrinkled forehead of a great great man WITH a ref [[WP:CITE]]-->

West Virginia Barnstar

All- MANY MANY thanks to user: Kelvinsong below is a proposed West Virginia Barnstar. I believe that this Barnstar is hands down no bullshit wonderful and a perfect summary of this state and its idea. THANKS to Kelvinsong!!Coal town guy (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


The West Virginia Barnstar
A barnstar as thanks for your work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of West Virginia topics.

DC project scope

Hi! I started a discussion about the DC WikiProject scope at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_District_of_Columbia#Expand_scope.3F. I would like to extend the project's scope to the whole metro area. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Help with article

Need some assistance with article Thank God for Mississippi. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template

Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Recognized content

Would it be more aesthetically pleasing and perhaps more organized if we format our recognized content on the WikiProject main page in a similar way to Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia/Recognized content and Wikipedia:WikiProject California? If we're able to reach a consensus, I'd be happy to make the necessary edits to format the WikiProject's main page accordingly. -- Caponer (talk) 10:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in the Americas may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015 Art+Feminism event in Morgantown

Hi West Virginia Wikipedians! I am reaching out to see if anyone would be interested in helping out with editing training for a Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism edit-a-thon being organized in Morgantown at West Virginia University. We would appreciate any assistance in securing at least one experienced Wikipedian in the area, and I'd be happy to put you in touch with the organizers if you are able to help out. If interested, please reply on wiki or by e-mail at thepwnco.wiki@gmail.com. Cheers! -Thepwnco (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

New Wikipedian in Residence Position at West Virginia University

West Virginia University Library just announced its new Wikipedian in Residence position for Gender Equity. The full time, one year position was funded as an Inspire Campaign Grant. Wikimedians with experience in GLAM-Wiki, the Education Program, working on the Gender Gap, and other related projects are invited to apply for this in-residence position. More information at Wikipedia:GLAM/WVU. I hope that you all share the opportunity with people you think would be interested, Sadads (talk) 21:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello all! I was curious if anyone else thought it might be a good idea to make a (nonbinding) guideline on how all the individual US state WikiProjects should organize themselves, to help standardize them. I originally put this suggestion in the WikiProject United States talk page, so feel free to look there if you're interested. It's pretty empty though; basically all they said was to see what each of the individual projects thought about it. Please tell me if you have any concerns with this idea; hopefully we can find a way for everyone to love it! Also, I'm new at making proposals, so please forgive me if I do anything silly. :) Hope that you like this idea! JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 04:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Missing West Virginia Supreme Court Justices

Drafts have been created for dozens of missing West Virginia Supreme Court Justices at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#West Virginia. Please help complete these drafts and move them to mainspace. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Cheers! bd2412 T 00:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

US 50,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more states than they might otherwise work on. If there's the interest I will start 1000 State Challenges like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of states regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for the US and your specialist/home state like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every state, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any state sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thankyou.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming "420 collaboration"

You are invited to participate in the upcoming

"420 collaboration",

which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017!

The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion.


WikiProject West Virginia participants may be particularly interested in the following: Cannabis in West Virginia.


For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer (Talk) 15:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Medical marijuana was just legalized in WV, anyone up to update the article? Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject West Virginia/Archive 5/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject West Virginia.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject West Virginia, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Bot run to auto assess some of the Unassessed articles

There is a discussion here for a Bot to do an assessment run through the 2000+ Unassessed articles that currently fall under WikiProject United States and the projects supported by it. Please post any comments or concerns you might have there. --Kumioko (talk)

Greetings from GLAM-Wiki US

Invitation to join GLAM-Wiki US
tight
tight

Hello! This WikiProject aligns closely with the work of the GLAM-Wiki initiative (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums), a global community of volunteers who assist cultural institutions with sharing resources with Wikimedia. GLAM-Wiki US is a new community initiative focused on organizing cultural collaborations within the United States. GLAM organizations are diverse and span numerous topics, from libraries and art museums to science centers and historic sites. We currently have a backlog of interested institutions- and we need your help!

Are you interested in helping with current or future GLAM projects? Join→ Online Volunteers

We hope you'll join the growing GLAM-Wiki community in the US. Thank you!
-Lori Phillips (Talk), US Cultural Partnerships Coordinator
For more information visit→ The GLAM:US portal or GLAM-Wiki on Outreach

History

Main article: History of _

Law and government

Main article: Law and Government of _


Geography

Main article: Geography of _


Geographic features

- orography - weather - soils - hydrography

Major highways

Adjacent counties

  • Abc County (north)
  • Nop County (northeast)
  • Xyz County, across the Deep River (east)
  • Mexico (south)
  • Pacific Ocean (west)

(A public domain list of adjacent counties for all 50 states

in wiki format is  available, but as of this writing has not been entered for all states. 
See talk page for status)

Economy

Main article: Economy of _


Demographics

Main article: Demographics of _


Cities and towns

Colleges and universities

Or alternatively use:

Education

<--! Not a soul cares about how dumb or how smart the kids are, use non biased data, cite the data per WP:CITE. Do not use a ultra liberal or ultra conservative citation and start a firestorm of controversy over the use of creative spelling, NO, GOD NO use WP:CITE-->

Unified school districts

Colleges and universities

Miscellaneous topics(Sports teams and similar lists) OR Notable residents

<--!Your best buddy who got a college degree and manages a warehouse of industrial waste is not notable, UNLESS they personally caused a massive disaster that killed many many people or wiped out a block. Otherwise, the person needs to have actually resided in the county. The Beatles taking a dump at the rest stop there 50+ years ago, does not make the Beatles, a notable Resident. Use WP:CITE for each person and WIKI LINK each person where possible. Local festivals,can be OK, as long as you do not describe delightful people, food etc etc, that why we have wikitravel. DO NOT list phone numbers or personal e mails of who can hook you up for the local pie eating contest use WP:CITE--> ..........

Notes and references

See WP:CITE for more information about how to use this section.


==


Monongah Article Upgrade

I did some work on the Monongah, West Virginia article. I'm not so good at trimming up the source citations, but I did provide links and titles best I could. I couldn't find a specific date in 1891 for the chartering of the town, which seemed odd. Looks like the legislature admitted a bunch of them at once. Perhaps someone with access to the official records or someone from town hall could provide a date and source? The article was full of opinions and minutia, much of which I disposed of. Check the previous iteration of the article and see if you disagree with the cuts. I'm in NJ and just happened to become interested in the town because the mine disaster is reputed to have prompted the start of Father's Day in the US. I learned a bit about Marion County today, my gift for Father's Day. Good luck with your work. ~~

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

2018 West Virginia teachers' strike

I've started 2018 West Virginia teachers' strike about the teachers' strike. If you could help expand it, that would be a big help.--TM 16:16, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

New West Virginia userbox templates

New West Virginia userbox templates are now available at Template:User WP West Virginia and Template:User WP United States. Let me know if you have any suggestions. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk contribs 23:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   08:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

RfC on election/referendum naming format

An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Updates to Wesley G. Bush article

Hello, I'm Jan, and I'm an employee of Northrop Grumman. I am interested in working with the Wikipedia community to make relevant updates and improvements to the Wesley G. Bush article. I've educated myself on Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and will do my best to follow those entirely. Since Wes Bush is a West Virginia native, I hope that someone on this page will review my proposed changes to the article, which I've posted at Talk:Wesley G. Bush, and put them into effect. If you have any questions, feedback, or comments, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you! JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2019 (UTC)  Done Thank you. JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

More updates to Wesley G. Bush article

Hello, it's Jan from Northrop Grumman, again. I'm here to see if there are any editors here willing to take a look at my additional requests to update the Wesley G. Bush article? I am requesting to make a few updates to the Career section. My complete request is posted on the Wes Bush Talk page. Please don't hesitate to reach out with any feedback, questions, or comments. Thank you! JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:West Virginia

Portal:West Virginia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:West Virginia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:West Virginia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Twomile was formerly Cuckleburr Creek

A tiny issue that is important to me, but otherwise of low importance is that Twomile Creek that runs over the ridge toward Edens Fork in Kanawha County, WV was formerly named Cuckleburr Creek. My mother was born there. Since I live in California, looking on a map was useless, for no such place seemed to exist, even when I checked with real estate contractors, etc.; nobody knew where it was. In 1999, while in West Virginia, I talked with an adult cousin (mother's nephew, born 1939), who used to walk over that ridge regularly as a child. He told me that Cuckleburr Creek was just over the ridge along Twomile, headed toward Edens Fork. Well, that was helpful, but I had no proof he was right. So I drove there, and at first there was no evidence. I saw an old man in a rocking chair (believe it or not) sitting on his front porch. I found a place to park and walked back to his residence (on Kanawha Two Mile Rd that runs alongside Twomile Creek). I inquired if he knew where Cuckleburr Creek was located. He said, this is it. He went in the house and showed me a utility bill that said Cuckleburr Creek on it for his address, still in use by the utility company (I don't know which one) in 1999, even though the name had changed long ago.

Hence my problem. I wanted to add Cuckleburr Creek as a former name of Twomile Creek, but I have no way to produce documented verification. Would this qualify for an exception in terms of "verifiable"?[1]

Dougcouch (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

I don't think it does. The problem with this sort of citation is that nobody but you can verify it—and even if it were online, all it would show is the address, not that "Cockleburr Creek" was ever the proper name of the creek. It's possible that it's a name for the creek—but it could only have been a name for the road, or an alternative name that never caught on beyond the neighbourhood. I checked USGS topographical maps of the area from 1909, 1958, and 1994, looking up and down all the branches of Twomile Creek that I could find, and some adjacent areas, just in case it was actually the name of another nearby creek, which the same road went to. It's possible that I missed it—the oldest map is the most likely to show names no longer in use, but the scale is also less helpful—features are much smaller, and small details are more likely to be nameless.
You can find these maps at the USGS Map Store (Google it, zoom in to find the area, and look for "products available". You don't have to pay for anything—the maps are free as pdf files you can download to your computer and zoom in to actual size, although I'd avoid the most recent ones, since they've got multiple CGI layers. The prices are just for having printed copies sent to you). I also checked the US Geographic Names Information System, and couldn't find any place called "Cockleburr" listed—normally it would include any place appearing on these maps, but there could be a typo: I note that "Cocklebur" is usually spelled with one 'r', and I may have missed it that way. You might try old county histories, if they have an index or you can search geographically—if there's a Hardesty's for Kanawha County, it might list the creeks in each of the original magisterial districts, but might not include the smaller branches.
Another possibility is that there was a post office called "Cockleburr Creek", even though the creek was never formally given that name. In the 19th century, postmasters were often allowed to name their post offices, which were smaller and much more local than they are today. Records of the appointment of postmasters are of public record, and can be viewed over the internet, in some cases. Or you might look for old Kanawha County deeds from the area—if you can identify properties that should have been along the creek, you might be able to trace them back—19th century deeds are often available for free to registered users on FamilySearch. Though it might be hard to get back that far without searching in Kanawha County... The difference between deeds and a utility bill is that deeds are matters of public record. Even if they're hard for other people to find without going to a place where they're kept, they're definitely verifiable sources. As would be any published map or local history, or the Appointments of Postmasters. I may try a couple of things later on. But as for the utility bill, I don't think that qualifies as a verifiable source, since nobody else can view it, and even if they could, all it does is show the address, not prove the creek name. P Aculeius (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Utility bill of resident on Two Mile Rd., Kanawha County, West Virginia in 1999

Article request: Housing in West Virginia

Wikipedia readers would be grateful if your project would consider creating a new article about Housing in West Virginia. Here are some sources of information:

  • Category:Housing in West Virginia
  • Housing Needs By State: West Virginia, Washington, DC: National Low Income Housing Coalition, retrieved October 26, 2020
  • "West Virginia", COVID-19 Housing Policy Scorecard, Eviction Lab, retrieved October 26, 2020
  • "West Virginia Homelessness Statistics", Usich.gov, Washington DC: U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, retrieved October 26, 2020
  • (West+Virginia+housing), Digital Public Library of America (assorted materials)
  • (West+Virginia+housing), UK: Core.ac.uk Open access icon (assorted materials)
  • (West+Virginia+housing), Germany: Base-search.net Open access icon (assorted materials)

Best regards, -- M2545 (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Does this place exist?

It's Algeria, West Virginia. Such a placename is attested, but after a quick search online I wasn't able to find any substantial information about it at all. Is there anything I'm missing? Do we need this article? Incidentally, the article gets about 6 views a day, and 5 of them are due to the hatnote at Algeria. – Uanfala (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

It's likely that the place is mentioned in local histories and county records. Even if there's not a lot of traffic, the fact that readers might come across the name and wonder where it is seems like a good reason for it to have an entry. Of course, it is barely a stub, but so are many articles in major encyclopedias—except that unlike them, we're not concerned with page count. I suppose that this and similarly short articles about ghost towns or "barely there" communities could be consolidated into longer articles about such places in each county—but in that case, the present title would redirect there, meaning that in practical terms, this title would still exist. Not sure that would be an improvement. Would it be better if readers hoping to find information about a small or formerly-populated place they've heard about find nothing on Wikipedia, instead of confirmation that it exists, or did exist, in a particular place? P Aculeius (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
The concern then would be the reliability of the little content we have here – a stub based entirely on a mention in a database doesn't inspire much confidence here. If there is any content in local histories and the like, then of course, that would be a different matter. – Uanfala (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Since the source is the GNIS, I think we can take it for granted that the information cited to it is correct. That's about as authoritative a source as there is. There may be mistakes, and omissions—I've seen a few—but the GNIS is presumptively reliable in cases like this. As desirable as more information might be, the article doesn't need to be "backed up" by other sources in order to stand. P Aculeius (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
I've added some details that I was able to find. There's probably more available, but this is what I could find easily from home. P Aculeius (talk) 21:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Drafts for missing Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Drafts have been seeded for the following missing Justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia (many of whom also held other state offices, or played other parts in the history of the state):

Any improvements to these towards getting them moved to mainspace would be appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 20:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in 2022 Amplifying Appalachia Edit-a-thon, March 20-25

Hi y'all!

Some of you might have participated last year in WVU Libraries' Amplifying Appalachia Edit-a-thon, which was a huge success, with 94 editors, 61 article edited or added to, 291 references added, and 24,400 words!

We're holding the event again, asynchronously, during the third week of March (March 20-25).

Our Edit-a-thon is focused on amplifying the stories and figures of under-represented Appalachian artists, writers, and other creators, particularly womxn, people of color, LGBTQ individuals, and other disenfranchised communities. We have been lucky enough to work with Art+Feminism and our event is held under that umbrella!

If you want to participate, please sign up through this link: https://artandfeminism.org/edit_a_thon/amplifying-appalachia-2022-edit-a-thon/ ... which will take you to our event dashboard, which has some starting points for pages that need some attention (under construction as of 2/4/2022). The password to join is "wvu2022".

Rhizomesandranch (talk) 21:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Avis Overhead Bridge Draft

While researching a historic bridge in Hinton, WV, I noticed that there was not a Wikipedia page. The bridge design is very very rare (Marsh Rainbow Arch), and currently the state is looking for someone to restore the bridge.

I created a draft with hopes of it being approved. I am novice at Wikipedia, but I was hoping someone here could make sure it became published or assist with the draft. There are plenty of sources that document the history of the bridge, but I wasn't able to add a photo of it to the page.

Thanks Mclutter (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

GAR for WVU football

West Virginia Mountaineers football, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 06:42, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I have nominated List of governors of West Virginia for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Schwede66 19:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)