Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo/Archive The Legend of Zelda 4

WT:ZELDA

Archives

All the Zelda CD-I games should be merged into one article

Hi, I had tagged a merge proposal for all Zelda CD-I games to be merged into one article which can be found here. However, this merge proposal was tagged in September 2007 and there were few comments on the talk page. So I decided to bring it up here. Magiciandude (talk) 01:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very good idea, better to have one good article than 3-5 stubs. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navigational Templates

Recently I created Template:The Legend of Zelda in an effort to make a navigational table that covered the full range of Zelda articles on Wikipedia, effectively depreciating Template:Zelda, Template:Zelda games and Template:Zelda characters. Since then other users have indicated that I may have been too bold and should have gained a consensus before enacting the change. They hve also indicated that I should have either worked on the old template rather than creating the new one from scratch or at least linked the talk pages. The reason I created the new template rather than working on the current ones was that I was tring to incorporate elements I hadn't used before (see this version) and I didn't want to cause any disruption to something in active use (it took me a while to get it right before I had to simplify it). If there is indeed a consensus for the new template I'll link the page histories to the talk page and then see if it would be possible for an admin to merge all of the histories together. I'm sorry to have caused any trouble, I was trying to be bold not reckless and I genuinely think that a single template (the one I created or otherwise) is a better navigational solution that the three that existed previously (and now currently). Sorry about the trouble. Guest9999 (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think combining them into one template is a good idea. --- RockMFR 16:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, consensus has existed to do so for quite a while, so good job getting it done. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for the change, provided we can move the talk/edit history somehow. The most important talk/edit history is template:Zelda games, as that was the main template. Not sure how you would keep the other stuff but the Zelda games template history/talk definitely needs to be moved to the new location. Also creating copy of this discussion on the Zelda games template as well. This is from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Legend of Zelda series Berenlazarus (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, there seems to be a consensus to use the new template. I'll link the old templates' history to the talk page of the new template and then try and get an admin to merge the page histories of the new template and Template:Zelda games. For now I'll move the two other templates (Template:Zelda and Template:Zelda characters) to wikiproject space to preserve their histories. Guest9999 (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to the appreciated efforts of Chrislk02, all three original template histories have now been merged into the new one. I hope the result is to everyone's liking. Guest9999 (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Why was the red color and triforce symbol removed? It was an awesome looking template, it should be changed back to the way it was. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably for consistency with similar templates. The Prince (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...Not to be rude or anything, but what does that matter? Why can't we have a unique template? It's not like red is hard to read. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually neutral to the decoration, but I think there should be a limit. Look for example at this template which IMO is way too much. The Prince (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that OC template is too much. But this one is really cool!! I vote we bring it back. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redoing the article index

Take a look! Wikipedia:WikiProject The Legend of Zelda series/index Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New SVG for you guys

Hi guys, I made Image:Crest of Hyrule.svg and Image:Crest of Hyrule black.svg.--Suit777 (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely those are copyrighted. You should take those off of Commons. Pagra shtak 21:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed members userboxes

I just thought I should drop you guys a quick line, I replaced 30 instances of the old userbox with the new one. Just in case anyone saw me poking around in their userpage. The edit summary was: replacing with proper userbox, Replaced: {{User:Scepia/UB/WPJ Zelda}} → {{WikiProject The Legend of Zelda series/Userbox}} using AWB. May the triforce be with you. xenocidic (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up the portal

I cleaned up the portal if anyone cares. The main thing I did was change the color scheme, for I thought the previous one was harder on the eyes. Artichoker (Discussion) 02:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask is under FAR. Buc (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link's Crossbow Training development

Well, I wrote up a six paragraph development section for LCT. :D I think that should be a focus, now that the FT is complete. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird Thing

For some reason, when I scroll the list of high quality zelda articles, the stars for the featured articles don't scroll with the rest of the box, and end up "floating" above the good articles. 142.166.242.245 (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series nominated for Deletion

Though I'm not involved in the LoZ project, I decided it would be most fair to bring this to the project's attention, as the people who work on the article are in my opinion the ones most qualified to vote in these deletion discussions. I was not the nominator - rather, I voted strong keep. McJeff (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures of Link map controversy

There's a dispute at Talk:Hyrule#Debunking the "Hyrule in Adventure of Link map" myth about whether the AoL link contains a LoZ map in the southwestern corner. Some text dumps contain quotes which indicating that Spectacle Rock and Death Mountain are in the southwestern corner of the AoL world map, however the text dumps are not reliable sources. Could someone who has the game confirm or refute the quote's authenticity? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Media franchises

Dear WikiProject The Legend of Zelda series participants...WikiProject Media franchises needs some help from other projects which are similar. Media franchises' scope deals primarily with the coordination of articles within the hundreds if not thousands of media franchises which exist. Sometimes a franchise might just need color coordination of the various templates used; it could mean creating an article for the franchise as a jump off point for the children of it; or the creation of a new templating system for media franchise articles. The project primarily focuses on multimedia franchises. It would be great if some of this project's participants would come over and help the project get back on solid footing. Also, if you know of similar projects which have not received this, let Lady Aleena (talk · contribs) know. Please come and take a look at the project and see if you wish to lend a hand. You can sign up here if you wish. Thank you. LA @ 21:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franchise naming convention discussion at WikiProject Media franchises

Dear WikiProject The Legend of Zelda series participants...WikiProject Media franchises is currently discussing a naming convention for franchise articles. Since this may affect one or more articles in your project, we would like to get the opinions of all related projects before implimenting any sweeping changes. Please come and help us decide. Thanks! LA (T) @ 22:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into WP:VG task force

A discussion regarding WikiProject The Legend of Zelda merge has been added to the talk page of the Wikiproject: Video Games. As a contributor to the project, please add your opinions to it [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#{{{2}}}|here]]. Thank you.

From my observation, this WP is largely inactive, and despite the large number of editors who are a part of this project, many of them either haven't edited in quite some time or haven't edited a Zelda article in recent history. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think, instead, that most of them know what needs to be done and are doing it, so there hasn't been need for discussion on this page. I wouldn't call the WP "dead", as editing on the various Zelda pages is still going strong.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that's why we should make it a task force instead of deleting our project. Due to the low level of activity, it makes sense. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To raise taskforce activity (assuming we get to that), I think we should direct people to discuss some things on this page, specifically if it pertains to multiple articles. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KrystenKryo, you may have a point there. But that doesn't mean that becoming a task force would be a bad idea. :) --Izno (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To slightly further my point, what you said is exactly why becoming a task force would be a good idea. There is some amount of not-so-small bureaucracy involved with running a WikiProject, and that all goes away by becoming a task force, which leaves you, as you said you're already doing, to edit articles. :) --Izno (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for The Legend of Zelda

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:20, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)