Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Kansas/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Interstate shields

Well, we don't have official sign drawing, then howwe get the interstate style from. Interstate-Guide basically shade this state in pink. It was upload by User:o and add in infobox, or should we overwrite it so it look like .--Freewayguy ^{Msg USC} 01:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I didn't upload those Kansas interstate signs, User-O did, plus he add the Kansas interstate/specific in the infobox. I still have doubt if Kansas uses neutral or state-specific shields now. i-135, 235, 70, and 35 lack Kansas state names.--Freewayguy ^{Msg USC} 01:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I think we should just keep state-specific out mostly. Kansas is a pink state, and we don't have accessible specs. However we can use it on article body only since state-specific is still commonly use o I-35, I-70, i-335 and I-470. Everything else we should use neutral shields until we get the proper specs.--SCFReeways 23:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC on coordinates in highway articles

There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 01:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)