Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thelema/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Thelema. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
OTO Bodies
Anyone feel that individual OTO bodies could use a wiki page? I just joined the project, and would love to help out. This isn't necessarily my strong suit (although back issues of Agape provide great sources), but would love to hear other opinions.
I think that "competing" branches of OTO should have individual pages. I do not think that this should extend down to individual Lodges or other subordinate units of branches. I think that the purpose should be to illustrate the ideas and histories of the organizations. Just my opinion. Estéban (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject_Thelema Out Of Date Things
I noticed that "The Aleister Crowley Desk Reference" (redflame93.com/DeskReference.html) is at a no longer registered domain. Additionally, the "user thelema" userbox doesn't seem to work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fr.333 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:46, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Anyone here? We've got a dispute going at that article and Talk:Thelema about the scholarly sources on Rabelais and Aleister Crowley. Dan (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Saints article
Been trying to resolve a dispute over Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica. Can we get some other voices involved, regarding the difference between the EGC and other organizations like EGnU? (Zack Anderson) 75.73.50.113 (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Didn't have that article on my watchlist or I'd already have tried to help. Seems the name of the article might be too specific and maybe it should be moved. I'll be over. (P.S. you should put new sections at the end of talk pages, not the beginning). Will in China (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Magical Tools
Wiccans have the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_tools_in_Wicca
Because of the extensive outlines in various Thelemic literature (such as MiTP), it would not be too difficult for Thelemites to have a similar article. Would it make sense to make a Magical tools in Thelema article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.46.61.89 (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Popular pages
User:Mr.Z-man has a new service available to various requesting WikiProjects which gives the project a monthly update of the number of hits on the 1,000 most frequently accessed articles for that project. An example of such a listing can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Popular pages. Would the members of this project be interested in getting such a list for their use? John Carter (talk) 18:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that could be very useful --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 20:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Rating Project Pages
Since I've been going round updating a bunch of the Wiki Project Thelema pages over the past months, I've started re-examining the ratings that the articles had and bringing those up to date. I'd tried to stick closely to the Project guidelines, but please feel free to discuss in this section any other rating changes you'd like to see. --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Reassessment, particularly quality reassessment, needs to be done regularly. Regarding importance assessment, one thing I'm trying to enact over at the Christianity WikiProject is to have the navigation template for the subject, which in this case would be either Template:Thelema series or Template:Thelema, listing only those articles which are deemed as being of the "Top" importance to the project. Other articles could be linked by other navigation templates. But having a clear idea as to which articles are of the most importance, and, by extension, which should be the first choices to further develop or add new material to, might be useful in any event. Thank you for the work. John Carter (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that's a great idea. However currently I think we only have two articles rated Top, since I've tried to stay pretty conservative with ratings wherever possible. So either we'd need to re-rate things to bring a few more up to Top rating, or make it Top & High. Either is fine by me - what do others think? Rodneyorpheus (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Generally, any article which has a {{main article}} link in the main article itself is also generally of "top" importance. I'm not sure if that would work in this case, though. A separate History of Thelema article might be useful, and I would definitely count Aleister Crowley as Top importance. If there were a Theology of Thelema or maybe Philosophy of Thelema, I might add them as well. Articles of that type tend to be somewhat consistent across "religion" projects. Those would be about the only ones I would add that aren't already included as links from the main Thelema article, and, like I said, I'm not really sure about all of them. John Carter (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think that's a great idea. However currently I think we only have two articles rated Top, since I've tried to stay pretty conservative with ratings wherever possible. So either we'd need to re-rate things to bring a few more up to Top rating, or make it Top & High. Either is fine by me - what do others think? Rodneyorpheus (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Thelema to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thelema/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. I can also get provide the full data for any project covered by the bot if requested, though I normally don't keep it for much longer than a couple weeks after the list is generated. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 04:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is great, well done! --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 07:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Changes to popular pages lists
There are a few important changes to the popular pages system. A quick summary:
- The "importance" ranking (for projects that use it) will be included in the lists along with assessment.
- The default list size has been lowered to 500 entries (from 1000)
- I've set up a project on the Toolserver for the popular pages - tools:~alexz/pop/.
- This includes a page to view the results for projects, including the in-progress results from the current month. Currently this can only show the results from a single project in one month. Features to see multiple projects or multiple months may be added later.
- This includes a new interface for making requests to add a new project to the list.
- There is also a form to request a change to the configuration for a project. Currently the configurable options are the size of the on-wiki list and the project subpage used for the list.
- The on-wiki list should be generated and posted in a more timely and consistent manner than before.
- The data is now retained indefinitely.
- The script used to generate the pages has changed. The output should be the same. Please report any apparent inconsistencies (see below).
- Bugs and feature requests should be reported using the Toolserver's bug tracker for "alexz's tools" - [1]
-- Mr.Z-man 00:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Thelema articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Thelema articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Request for input in discussion forum
Given the closely linked subjects of the various religion, mythology, and philosophy groups, it seems to me that we might benefit from having some sort of regular topical discussion forum to discuss the relevant content. I have put together the beginnings of an outline for such discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/2011 meeting, and would very much appreciate the input of any interested editors. I am thinking that it might run over two months, the first of which would be to bring forward and discuss the current state of the content, and the second for perhaps some more focused discussion on what, if any, specific efforts might be taken in the near future. Any and all input is more than welcome. John Carter (talk)
Automated message by Project Messenger Bot from John Carter at 15:44, 5 April 2011
Related articles
I went through one of the current encyclopedias of the occult for the WikiProject Occult, as can be seen on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Occult page. The source used contained a number of articles relating to Aleister Crowley, the Order of the Golden Dawn, and Thelema. I am not sure that they all deserve necessarily to have separate articles here, and certainly some of them pertain to Thelema in only a minor way, but I thought it might make sense to have at least a basic list of some relevant subjects. Items listed below which don't merit individual articles are certainly eligible for redirects, of course.
- Abrahadabra; Adept; Adeptus Exemptus; Adeptus Major; Adeptus Minor; Aeon; Aima Elohim; Aiwass; Alchemy; Aleister Crowley; Allen Bennett; Alpha et Omega; Ameset; AMORC; Ankh; Anna Bonus Kingsford; Anna Sprengel; Anton Szandor LaVey; Anubis; Apophis; Aquarius; Aral; ARARITA; Arch-fay; Argentum Astrum; Aries; Arnoldo Krumm-Heller; Aroueris; Arthur Edward Waite; Ascendant; Astrology; Atlantis; Aura; Aurum Solis;
- Babalon; Book of Shadows; Book of the Law; Bornless One ritual; Builders of the Adytum;
- Cabala; Cabalistic cross; Cabeiri; Cadeucus; Cancer; Canopic gods; Capricorn; Castle of Heroes; Ceremonial magic; Charge of the Goddess; Charles Williams; Chnoubis; Cipher manuscript; Color scales; Companions of the Coinherence; Coptic language; Corpus Christi; Cromlech Temple; Crucifixion; Cup;
- Dadouchus; Death; Decans; Degrees (fraternal); Devil; Dion Fortune; Directions in occultism; Doreen Valiente; Druidry; Duamutef;
- Edom; Eliphas Levi; Elman Zata; Enochian magic; Enochian watchtowers; Equinox; Eucharist; Eve; Evil Persona; Evocations;
- Flashing colors; Flashing tablet; Flying roll; Fool; Forty-two Assessors; Franciscus de Bry; Frater Achad; Fraternal lodge; Fraternitas Saturni;
- Geomancy; George Pickingill; Gerald Gardner; Gemini; Godforms; Goetia; The Goetia;
- The Hanged Man; Hapi; Harpocrates; Harry Smith; Harvey Spencer Lewis; Heh; Hermetic Order of Luxor; Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn; Hexagram; Horus; Hru; Hua; Hugo Alverda;
- IAO; Initiation; Intelligence; Invisible Stations; Invisibility; Isaac Luria; Isis; Israel Regardie;
- Jack Parsons; John Williams Brodie-Innes;
- Key of Solomon;
- Libra; License to deport; Lotus wand; Lovers;
- Macrocosm and Microcosm; Magic; Magical lodge; Magical sword; Magick; Meditation; Middle Pillar exercise;
- Nemyss; Neopaganism;
- Order of the Stella Matutina; Ordo Templi Orientis; Osiris;
- Paroketh; Paschal Beverly Randolph; Paul Foster Case; Pentagram; Pentagrammaton; Phrath;
- Qebehsenuf;
- Ra Hoor Khurt; Rising on the planes; Rituals of the Hexagram; Rituals of the Pentagram; Rosicrucians; Royal stars; Ruach;
- Sagittarius; Samuel Jacob Hayim Falk; Samuel Liddell Masters; Satanism; Scorpio; Scrying; Seven Earths; Sex and occultism; Shroud of Concealment; Sigil; Sleep of Sialim; Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia; Solitary practitioner; Sphere of sensation;
- Taliahad; Talisman; Talismans; Tarot; Tattvas; Tattvic tides; Taurus; Telesmatic imagery; Thelema; Theosophical Society; Thomas Lake Harris;
- Vault of Christian Rosencreutz; Veil of the Sanctuary; Vibratory formula of the Middle Pillar; Victor Neuberg;
- Wand; Watchtowers; Wheel of Fortune; Wicca; Will; William Butler Yeats; William Wynn Westcott; The World;
John Carter (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
I would like to inform you of a Nomination for Deletion of the article about Richard Kaczynski, biographer of Aleister Crowley, which may be of interest to members of this project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Kaczynski_%282nd_nomination%29 Rosencomet (talk) 20:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleting Thelema userbox
93, I was wondering why the Template:User thelema userbox and all of the other userboxes on this page have been deleted? 93 93/93 JessicaSideways (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Proposed MOS for Religion
There is now a proposed general Manual of Style for Religion and other articles relating to ethoses or belief systems at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Manual of style. Any input would be welcome. I personally believe at least one of the reasons why many articles in this field have been as contentious as they have been is because of lack of such guidelines, and would very much welcome any input from others to help come up with some generally acceptable solutions to some of these problems. John Carter (talk) 22:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Circletriangle.gif
image:Circletriangle.gif has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Popular pages tool update
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Deletion discussion for Category:Thelema stubs
The related Category:Thelema stubs has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. |
Dawynn (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thelema/Archive 4/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Thelema.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Thelema, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Universal hexagram upside down
This may have been addressed and I could be wrong, but the central 5 pointed portion of the universal hexagram should be with a single point up. The current version is essentially upside down to Crowley's diagrams. For example, the cover of the 1st edition of Magick: http://www.lawbright.com/logdos/magick1.jpg and this original illustration: http://www.lawbright.com/logdos/magick2.jpg I suggest it be rotated to the form Crowley himself used. --Solar (talk) 12:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Great Work listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Great Work to be moved to Great Work (Hermeticism). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Need Help with a Draft of a neo-Gnostic Occultist
Hello those who are here, I am looking for help about a draft article on William Wallace Webb who is a neo-Gnostic bishop who founded the Qabbalistic Alchemist Church, upon other churches who had relations with William Breeze, Stephen Hoeller, etc. KEleison (talk) 04:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- I looked at it, searched Google Books - nothing. He's simply not notable. Skyerise (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Jack Parsons (rocket engineer) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Jack Parsons (rocket engineer) to be moved to Jack Parsons. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Nomination of Allen H. Greenfield for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen H. Greenfield (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.