Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/The Apprentice UK task force

Talk template

Nice idea to create this project and give some organisation to these articles! Unfortunately, the image Image:Sugar_and_assistants.jpg is copyright and used on Wikipedia under fair use grounds. This prohibits its use on things such as Template:Apprentice_uk_project (from Wikipedia:Fair_use: Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion. This is because it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image only if no free alternative exists and only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum). I've removed it from your template, accordingly. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tasks

I'm intrigued about your only two tasks:

Make sure all pages are categorised, if possible.
Add logos to all pages.

Firstly, what logo should be added to all pages? Secondly, all of what pages should be categorised? All articles relating to the Apprentice are already in Category:The Apprentice UK... _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If adding logos, bear in mind that copyright logos used as fair use have strict limits on their use as decoration. Notinasnaid 11:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Relief Does The Apprentice

Following a comment from Dale, members may be interested in discussions regarding my recent changes at Talk:Comic Relief Does The Apprentice and Template talk:The Apprentice UK. Many thanks, _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 19:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need userbox

I need Apprentice fan userbox. Anwar 15:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode coverage

The WikiProject Television episode coverage taskforce have recently been working on a review process for episode articles. There are a rash of articles about individual episodes which fail notability, and are unlikely to ever reach such requirements. Many contributors are unaware of the specific guidelines to assess notability in episode pages: Wikipedia:Television episodes. We have expanded these guidelines to make them more helpful and explanatory, and we invite you to read the guidelines, and make any comments on its talk page. After much discussion, we have created a proposed review process for dealing with problem articles. See: Wikipedia:Television article review process. We invite discussion of this process on its talk page. General comments about this whole process are welcome at the episode coverage taskforce talkpage. Thanks! Gwinva 10:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Series article titles

I recently moved the articles in accordance with standard Wikipedia nomenclature as such: The Apprentice (UK Series One) to The Apprentice (UK series 1) etc. I was then told that they were supposed to be named "one" instead of "1" because of some BBC thing. This is fine, except disambiguatory text in brackets should always be lowercase, i.e. "UK series one". Are there any objections to the articles being named like that? - LeonWhite 20:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't particularly mind, however this discussion has come up before - a few of the regular editors are on Wikibreaks and I know some of them raised the point that because these were titles, they should be capitalised. Personally, I'd say leave it for now as there's no need to change it. Remember, Leon, that the conventions you are bringing up are not set in stone, they are guidelines. Exceptions, such as this, are allowed. Seaserpent⁸⁵ _Talk 21:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I re-watched the You're Hired! episode of series three the other day, where Adrian Chiles introduced Simon and Kristina as the winner and runner up of The Apprentice 2007 respectivley. I have just finished reading Michelle Dewberry's autobiography, in which she says that Chiles introduced her onto the stage as the winner of The Apprentice 2006. Maybe they should be named The Apprentice 2005 (UK) and so on. The Big Brother UK articles used to be called Big Brother (UK series 7) and so on, until someone on their WikiProject raised that Davina (the host) always says "...and the winner of [Celebrity] Big Brother 200[0/1/2/3/4/5/6/7] is...", so it was changed. Should we follow this also? Dalejenkins | 16:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The official website and all BBC literature still refers to the series by numbers. I'd have an issue with the year format as the actual filming takes place the year before - ie. what would be the 2007 series was filmed in 2006. Whatever happens I don't feel we should follow the Big Brother example - each series is known as The Apprentice when it airs, anything else (whether it be the year of the series number) should be in the disambiguatory brackets. Seaserpent⁸⁵ _Talk 22:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You invited me?

Hi, you invited me to help with the project, but I'm not entirely sure what I should do, can somebody help? CyberWiki (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Hewer

I've improved it a bit. XCharltonTilliDieX^Talk/_Contribs 16:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apprentice Template

Not meaning to show off or brag here, just pointing out that the 5 or so articles listed in the Apprentice UK template that were previously missing it have now had it added. The only one that doesn't is the Apprentice US, because I assume it doesn't need it. A surprisingly easy thing to overlook actually, I reckon I should spend more time here attaching templates to articles that should have them that don't...Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 02:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't overlooked - besides James Max (an article with a history of being dleted and redirected) all of the ones you've readded did originally have the template on but have since been removed by their respective editors. Articles such as Talkback Thames and Dru Masters could end up with hundreds of navboxes on if you put every related series on. You also have to think whether someone reading an article on Dru Masters would be interested in every aspect of the Apprentice, or whether (more likely, IMHO) they would - if interested - follow a wikilink to the main series and explore from there if they wanted. Just a heads up for you :) Seaserpent⁸⁵ 11:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Hi, I have worked quite hard to try and retain formatting across ALL four seasons of the Apprentice. This includes candidate profiles (and linking to any relevant articles), and the weekly challenges (structure, formatting). I'm not very familiar with he use of templates but understand they are a bit like macros, in that they replace repetitive procedures? Well, I see someone has attempted to create a template, but should we all come to a consensus? I would like to get all these articles up to good status. I started a discussion here about it. Any comments are appreciated. Many thanks, δ²_(Talk) 01:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the WikiProject to a worldwide venture

I've been thinking about removing the "UK-only" factor from this WikiProject and making it focus on the foreign version of the programme also, such as the US series, Irish series and other international versions of the programme. WP:BIGBRO does this, with collabirators from across the world, and it works well. Clearly, the interest is there as many editors are working on articles of the programme's foreign versions and we currently have just 26 articles in our WikiProject, which will probably expand to around 32 at most within the next 2 years. The American version's articles need the most work but, as mentioned, there are so many editors of these articles that I'm sure we'll be able to recruit enough people to join the project and make positive changes. Your thoughts? Dalejenkins | 20:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem with this, and our eyes on their articles and theirs on ours can only be a good thing as far as copy editing goes. We can also standardise formatting within the whole series, which would definitely improve readability. Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I wish to expand and/or improve the British Apprentice articles, I use the equivalant American article. This would standardize infoboxes, categories etc. and increase the scope, the amount of possible editors and amount of articles. Lizzie Harrison 17:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay, I've been in America all summer. Sounds like a great idea to me, when I'm back in the UK I'll be more than happy to help out with everything. Seaserpent⁸⁵ 00:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the project was to incorporate as least the American series then I would join. I don't edit the UK series because BBC America is just now airing the first UK series. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 16:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The articles that would need the most work would be the British ones, actually. The American Apprentice is the original show and the other articles should follow its pattern, not the contrary. --Tam001 (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's that time of year...

Hello again all, I hope as many of you as possible are going to be back working on the WP again this year. Expect the Series Five article to get bombarded very soon, I think we've done a pretty good job in previous years of keeping the article readable throughout the airing of the series. Whilst it's still relatively quiet, anyone have any nominations for getting another article up to GA? Perhaps Series Four? Seaserpent⁸⁵ 17:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Seaserpant! It has been a jolly long while (I think a year) since I was last tempted to look here. And yet again I feel myself drawn back to edit. I would love to become involved once again at working to improve all the articles under this project, so GA status reviews will be good to get stuck into. Whilst I appreciate the series has started, we can still work on this quietly as this project hasn't received much attention. Want to discuss further? Leave me a message. Many thanks, δ²_(Talk) 12:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:48, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Scope

Why WikiProject The Apprentice UK and not WikiProject The Apprentice? 28 articles seems way too few to warrant a project. It would make more sense to have a project encompassing all Apprentice articles, and even that would be a small project. --Jameboy (talk) 16:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the above discussion. #Changing the WikiProject to a worldwide venture - Lizzie Harrison 14:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Hewer Anomaly

This is the first time I've ever written on a Wiki talk, so apologies if this isn't the sort of thing it's for.

Having just read the Nick Hewer article I noticed a contradiction. The first sentence introduces him as residing in Writtle, Essex. However, later the article states that he lives in Northamptonshire. The reference for this statement is an interview published in the Telegraph in March 2009; should the introduction be amended to reflect this or am I missing something?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Idlejim (talk • contribs) 00:31, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to TV#MOS

I'm not sure how many people monitor WP:MOSTV or even WP:TV (the basic WikiProject for all of us), but we've been trying to get some feedback on additions to the TV Manual of Style. It largely has to do with the inclusion of "Overview" tables at the start of the page, the order in which season lists are presented (currently, there is no concrete order), and what is considered too much info for DVDs (i.e. should we be placing every detail about the box set in the article, from each interview to the aspect ratio, or should be keep it more generalized). Please see discussion at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice UK articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the The Apprentice UK articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

I have nominated The Apprentice (UK TV series) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Series overview tables

Please come to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#Series overview tables and the like to discuss the implementation of these tables in television articles, from main articles to List of Episode pages. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leaflet for Wikiproject The Apprentice UK at Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 10:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Turn this WikiProject into a Taskforce?

I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing inactive task forces

I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to close inactive task forces, including this one. Gonnym (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]