Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Holby task force/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Television. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

WikiProject BBC

...is also tagging the Holby articles(' talk pages) – perhaps this project could be a child thereof? D B D 17:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought I'd replied to this long ago, but evidently not! Having cast a cursory glance at the BBC WP, it seems to be the case that they don't actually have any child projects as such, though have integrated the BBC Comedy WP as a task force. I'm not entirely certain then, how this WP would or could slot into their set-up, though I'd have no opposition to becoming a child project thereof. Frickative 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Jospeh Byrne GAN: On Hold

GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Article cut down

In the past week, I redirected all of the HolbyBlue character articles to the main character list, then per the only single response on the talk page, redirected that itself to a condensed list, integrated into the main HolbyBlue article. My reasoning for such can be found on the relevant talk page, however in brief, it stands that many of the articles which fall under this WikiProject are written in an unencyclopedic, crufty, in-universe, unreferenced fashion, with a number of them failing basic notability policy. I'm certainly guilty of contributing to this to a large extent - when I first began editing Holby articles around ten months ago, I was responsible for creating a number of character articles with every one of the aforementioned attributes, several of which remain to date stubs barely expanded since creation.

However, being somewhat more familiar with Wiki policy and guidelines now (at least compared to my complete ignorance ten months ago!) I'm going to propose a bit of an overhaul of the WikiProject and the articles which fall within its scope. We're down to around 85 articles at the moment, from presumably just over 100 prior to replacing the HolbyBlue character articles with redirects. I strongly believe focus at present should be on reducing this number yet further, and then improving the articles which remain. A present, three of the articles within the project's scope have attained Good Article status, and with a bit of editing and re-jigging, I've a couple more in mind to nominate in the near future. I definitely think quality over quantity is something we should be striving for.

As such, ideally what I'd like to do is redirect the following articles into the relevant character lists. The ones I'm suggesting I believe to be non-notable, with nothing in the way of reliable, second party references available. Some of them are characters that haven't been around long - and so allowing for change of circumstance may be deserving of an article in the future - but at the moment simply aren't. The list in full:

While I may have missed a few off in scanning the master list, if I've counted right, that's 25 articles listed here, of which I believe I began 10. Faintly embarrassing in retrospect, but then at least I'd like to rectify that now! Most of the pages under the scope of this project see very little editing or input as is, so if there's no immediate opposition, I'll get working on this tomorrow. And of course any changes made will be fully reversible, should any conflict arise :)

As I say, I think the main efforts of this project should be concentrated on improving the articles we have with the potential to become Good or even A class, rather than maintaining dozens and dozens on unencylcopedic stubs. On that note, this has become quite a long post, and I think I've got across everything I wanted to say, so I'll leave it at that! Frickative 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Guidelines

WP:FICT has been revised

WP:FICT, the notability guideline for elements within a work of fiction (characters, places, elements, etc) has a new proposal/revision that is now live [1] Everyone is encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page. Ned Scott 22:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Notability (serial works)

There is a proposal to split WP:EPISODE into a more general notability guideline, Wikipedia:Notability (serial works), and make the rest of WP:EPISODE just a MOS guideline. Please join in at WT:EPISODE#Proposed split of EPISODE and/or Wikipedia talk:Notability (serial works). -- Ned Scott 22:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Sam Strachan

Just to let you know, I've passed Sam Strachan as a Good Article. Well done! - weebiloobil (talk) 17:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:14, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)