Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Swaminarayan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Creaton of Wikiproject

The creation of this wikiproject was through a decision here. A consensus decided upon the creation of this wikiproject    Juthani1   ^tcs 20:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The first 9 members to join the project, including me, joined when the project was being proposed here. Others ,within these 9, joined when the construction of the Wikiproject was taking place in my Sandbox. The names of these members have been moved from these areas to the final project page    Juthani1   ^tcs 11:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

First Collabration

Now that this workgroup is reality, it will help in collaboration in Swaminarayan articles. I feel the first step should be to collaborate and make Swaminarayan a GA class article and after that an FA class one. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 14:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

As a GA reviewer, i have listed the issues that may crop up in GAN at Talk:Swaminarayan#GA_issues_and_Peer_review__by_Redtigerxyz--Redtigerxyz (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I think Redtiger's review could be used as a start point on what has to be done to take a step forward to achieving GA status for the article. Redtiger - Thanks for the review .. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 23:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Problem

There is only one problem left to solve for the complete completion of this taskforce (workgroup). The problem is located in the formatting somewhere here- Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Swaminarayan articles by quality statistics (the workgroup's assessment log). The template does not show the assessments of importance and quality that all others do. This probelm needs to be resolved    Juthani1   ^tcs 21:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I think that this occurs at intervals, as seems to be the case with the Vaishnava wikiproject assessments - but I do not understand this process completely. Also, I have begun tagging articles for the project. As I tag them, I am trying to keep with the previous assessments of each article. Please feel free to review ALL of these, as I am not that good at assessments; just tagging. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Ism Schism - thanks for taking up the time consuming tagging task. Your assessments in Krishnaism have been great - why do u say ur not good at it. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 23:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I fixed it the issue here of WP:Swaminarayan . The importance categories were not defined properly earlier. See the new Stats . I have manually assessed 2 of the remaining unassessed articles. -- Tinu Cherian - 09:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Akshardham

Just to inform all members, Akshardham (Delhi) is a GA    Juthani1   ^tcs 22:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Great. It was a long time on hold. Finally it is GA. I suggest You initiate a WP:PR now. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Redtiger, ur prob the best one for the PR, why dont u do it? Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 15:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)