Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Ophthalmology task force
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Medicine/Ophthalmology task force page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Project Page
WPMED Newsletter and signup
Manual of style (medicine)
Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
List of participants
Popular pages
Assessment (Log)
How to help:
Article alerts and resources for editors
Articles for cleanup, deletion, and
orphaned
Patrol recent changes and sort stubs
Requested articles
Categories:
Project
Articles by quality and importance
New article needs attention: Subjective Refraction
[edit]Subjective Refraction is 90% instructional, violating WP:NOTHOWTO
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
[edit]Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for Comment Robert Lanza
[edit]There is a Request for Comment about Robert Lanza#Biocentrism that may be of interest to members of the WikiProject: Bibliographies/Science task force. Talk:Robert Lanza#Request For Comment Robert Lanza. I would encourage members of this project to consider participating to add diversity to the discussion. Sapphire41359 (talk) 17:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Split discussion (Visual cycle)
[edit]If interested, please discuss a split of Visual cycle from Visual phototransduction. Discuss here. Curran919 (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Improvement of Cataract surgery
[edit]I am working on this article, which is rated as high to top importance and is currently rated at C-class, and would welcome expert comment and assistance. I intend to leave it as at least B-class, and if things go well, GA, with the possibility of FA if there is enough interest in collaboration. Please feel welcome to peruse the state of the article and leave any useful comments and recommendations on the talk page. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 09:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)