Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oklahoma/Tulsa/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Oklahoma. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Article tagging

Even though this project page has not even be created yet, many articles have been tagged. I used AWB to go through and tag those articles. This is in addition to some tagging I did on my own (some of these I'm sure are in the category but its possible others are not). There are currently 150 articles tagged. I look forward to this task force getting up and going in the near future.↔NMajdan•talk 21:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

New task force page

Nice. Very well done. Using the Turnkey design is a good choice. Great selections for color. Good work!↔NMajdan•talk 01:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. It didn't take as long as I thought it would. Okiefromokla•talk 02:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Assessment Table

On another note, since I don't know how to do it, I wanted to see if you would change the assessment table to show the importance of the articles as well, such as the one under Wikiproject Oklahoma. Its useful because editors may want to edit a more important article that may be rated as start class versus a less important article rated as B class, or something like that. I realize all the articles will have their importance rated as it would pertain to Wikiproject Oklahoma, but it would still be useful. Okiefromokla•talk 02:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll add that.↔NMajdan•talk 13:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Done.↔NMajdan•talk 16:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm only seeing Top importance and "none." Maybe this will be automatically updated soon, i'll wait and see. Okiefromokla•talk 18:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Regional places listed under Task Force Tulsa

I have made some of the suburbs part of the task force, such as sand springs, jenks, bixby, etc. I think we should define how far we should go with this. In the definition of the task force I put that it includes everything in the Tulsa Metropolitan Area. This provides a definite boundary if we point to the actual Statistical Metropolitan Area and maybe the Bartlesville-Tulsa Combined MSA. So I believe we should work on getting the suburbs listed in the task force, but that brings up another issue. Do we include lakes, state parks, people from the suburbs, schools from the suburbs, etc? I say yes, because if the task force is going to help with Tulsa MSA topics it should include all topics. Any thoughts? Okiefromokla•talk 02:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Lets keep it Tulsa MSA. I'm hesitant to include Bartlesville because its so far away. It is its own statistical area.↔NMajdan•talk 16:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Looking through the categories of tulsa articles by importance I notice there is now a massive list of towns in Oklahoma listed under the task force, most of them are not even anywhere near Tulsa. There are also now a ton of articles listed under the taskforce of people who have no connection to Tulsa and places such as the blue river, with no connection to Tulsa. Many, many articles. What is the deal with this? Okiefromokla•talk 18:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I just noticed this too. May be an issue by my modification to the banner. I'm looking now.↔NMajdan•talk 20:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, my fault. I fixed the issue (forgot a set of }}). Now I'm just waiting for the template change to propagate to the categories so I can rerun the bot and get the numbers back down.↔NMajdan•talk 20:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Task Force Icon

Great job on the fixes. I believe we were at one point discussing the possibility of having a picture to accompany the phrase "this article is supported by the tulsa task force" on the talk page banner. Someone suggested the golden driller but I agree it is too dark. However, I suggest we just get a picture up there and we can change it later when a new picture becomes available. Since the GD is too dark, I suggest (Tulsa Skyline Night.jpg) even though it's at night. The other possible picture would be (Tulsa skyline.JPG) but because of its odd elongated shape it may be awkward to put in the banner. It is, however, taken at day. Maybe there could get some more suggestions or new pictures uploaded soon. We can always change it, so what to you guys think about just putting a picture up there asap? Okiefromokla•talk 23:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Since icons are transcluded on the fly, I would agree that adding a picture sooner is better. --Kralizec! (talk) 07:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

The image has to look good when reduced to a small size and I don't think the nighttime image of the Tulsa skyline does this. I really don't know if we have anything that would work. A daytime image of the Golden Driller might work, but it needs to be taken from a little ways away so its not looking up too much. There are some images of the outside of Cain's Ballroom here that might work.↔NMajdan•talk 21:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea which one of those pictures would work best. Maybe you could experiment on the most likely candidates? One idea could be to use this picture and crop it to cut off the edges. I went ahead and did that and put it here. I hope you don't mind because it is your picture. But that is my only idea. Okiefromokla•talk 01:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: If you croped the other picture of cains at day (the one showing the sign on the top of the building) in a similar way and made it square and centered on the sign it may work as well. Maybe see which one looks better? Your call. Okiefromokla•talk 01:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Nominating article for collaboration of month

There are five people who have listed their names for the taskforce so far. On that note, I don't know how much work will actually be done on a collaboration of the month, and I don't know when the rest of you even want to start having collaborations. However, I believe there are several articles that are pretty important in WikiProject Oklahoma and Taskforce Tulsa that I think desperately need to and should be improved greatly upon. After all, that's why this taskforce is here. So if anyone wants to vote or add other candidates to this list, please do so!

If you're worried about participation (rightly so), you could lengthen it to Collaboration of the Quarter.↔NMajdan•talk 00:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. I dont really like the idea of going from 12 collaborations a year to 4. There has to be an inbetween, maybe, 7 collaborations a year? But what would we call it, the Semimonthly Collaboration? For now I suppose we should just wait and see how participation goes before we change it. Okiefromokla•talk 15:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

June or July Candidates

Once again, if you want to do a collaboration of the month, please vote for one of the above nominations or nominate an article yourself. Please vote by signing your name under the article. Okiefromokla•talk 20:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I was going to wait until at least three of us have voted but Its been a couple days so I'll just vote for Tulsa Metro Area and go ahead and say that 3 out of 5 is a majority. Tulsa Metropolitan Area is the new Collaboration of the month/semimonth/quarter! Okiefromokla•talk 15:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

List class

I noticed some articles were tagged as List class. I am opposed to classifying articles as lists and I did not set up the project to recognize things tagged as List-class. Why? Because is there is such thing as List-class. Per Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment, there are only 6 classes: FA, A, GA, B, Start, & Stub. A list is still an article. It is in article namespace and should be treated as such. A list can also be FA quality, or B quality or even Start/Stub quality so it should be tagged as such. Anybody have any thoughts on this? If not, I'm going to re-rate the lists so they get put in the appropriate category.↔NMajdan•talk 20:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I probably rated a few of those articles as lists. I have no problem with them being changed. Okiefromokla•talk 21:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The Belvedere

I was thinking that the buried car might make a good separate article, now that it has been uncovered. Mention might also be made of the Plymouth Prowler buried in 1998 at Centennial Park (mentioned in todays Tulsa World). There is a start at Plymouth Belvedere. Dsmdgold 02:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe it could be an article entitled Tulsarama, which was the actual celebration that included the belvedere being drawn up. Such an article may also have to include the other celebrations around it and the unveiling at the convention center, etc. Otherwise, what would the article be called, Burried Belvedere? We could at least make some redirect pages since most people dont really know what "tulsarama" is. Any ideas for what to call the article?

What to name the article was my problem, if I could figure that out I would have started the it. I was tempted by "buried car", but Buried Belvedere might work. Tulsarama has the advantage of being the name of the event where the car was buried (I think, the World had an article about the beauty pagent they did at Tulsarama in 57 a few days ago) Did anyone go down to the car show and get a picture of the rust that could be released under a free licence? Dsmdgold 21:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe we need some more opinions on what to call the article. As for the picture, we don't need a pic of the actual car they pulled out of the ground. Just find a picture of rust. Then a car. And the caption could read "The buried belvedere was a fusion of rust and car." Ok, lets just find a picture of the actual car, I think what I just suggested is probably a better fit for unencyclopedia.Okiefromokla•talk 04:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

How about the buried car? Anyways, I heard that they were going to bury another car in November in the same place. I think that we may have enough information to create the article. As for sources, we can use newspapers and buriedcar.com. --Μ79_Šp€çíá∫íš†^{tell me about it}

Image Request

I will be downtown today. I'll try to take a picture with my digital camera of the sister cities.--Μ79_Šp€çíá∫íš†^{tell me about it}

Shortening Tulsa, Oklahoma

Could someone please help me looking over the Tulsa article closely? We need to discuss some specific ideas on what to remove to make this article shorter. My goal is to get this article down to 85KB or below, but I could live with 87kb or so. But the key is to do it without detracting from its quality as a featured article. Thanks for your help. Okiefromokla•talk 18:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Tulsa

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Tulsa Task Force ad

What do you think? Parker 23 34 03:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:47, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Okmulgee, Oklahoma page needs help!

Does somebody want to peek at the Okmulgee, Oklahoma page? Looks like it's been vandalized to me. The opening paragraph states that "Okmulgee means Forsaken or Foulest of Places in the Creek language." However, the cited footnote 4 indicates it means "boiling water." The paragraph also contains the sentence, "The site was chosen because the Creeks were forced to live there at gun point after the trail of tears." This again cites footnote 4, which link says nothing of the kind.

TulGuy (talk) 20:59, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)