Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/Minnesota Vikings subproject

Featured list removal candidate

I have nominated List of Minnesota Vikings seasons for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

List of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks

I don't know if anyone's noticed, but I've been trying to get the list of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks to a similar standard to the list of Kansas City Chiefs starting quarterbacks. Thanks to User:Gilliganfanatic, we now have a season-by-season breakdown of the number of games started by each quarterback, which I intend to add references to. There is also a section detailing the history of the Vikings' starting QB position. However, since I am a bit of a novice when it comes to football and I barely know anything about the history of the Vikes, I was hoping that someone from this project would be able to correct any details I've gotten wrong or omitted. Thanks. – Pee Jay 01:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this article is now at WP:FLC (see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks/archive1). Comments would be appreciated. – Pee Jay 08:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For those of you who weren't paying attention, this article got promoted to FL status this morning. For those of you who were paying attention, I've also listed List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches at WP:FLC for you to comment on. The discussion page is at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches/archive1. – Pee Jay 20:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please keep an eye on 1990, 93 and 99 season pages

I added tables with stadiums for the preseasons and some user is removing them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.30.252 (talk) 23:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 06:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]