Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/sources

I think that this list is a good start, I think that we need to categorise then a little though, for example (and this is very much a first pass at this and will need refinement) :

Likely Reliable Sources, may be good for helping to judge "enduring notability" of events

• http://sports.espn.go.com/extra/mma/
• http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mma/
• http://nbcsports.msnbc.com
• http://articles.latimes.com
• http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/ufc/
• http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sports/ (If you look at the archives of WP:RS/N there is some questions about the Huffington Post)

Borderline Reliable Sources, not so good or not good, for helping to judge "enduring notability" of events

• http://blog.chron.com/fighting/
• http://fightnetwork.com
• http://fiveouncesofpain.com
• http://mmafrenzy.com
• http://mmajunkie.com
• http://www.blackbeltmag.com/
• http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/fighting/
• http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/
• http://www.mmaontap.com/
• http://www.mmaweekly.com/
• http://www.sherdog.com
• http://www.tatame.com.br/

Likely Reliable Sources for results not good for helping to judge "enduring notability" of events

• http://boxing.nv.gov/
• http://www.ufc.com/

Mtking ^(edits) 09:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for the feedback, WP:RS/N is going to be very helpful. Another issue i have with the MMA specific pages is that they could very likely form a Walled garden. i'm thinking a table with three columns: source, is reliable, is not walled garden. not to say that they can't be used, but better to use others if available. Kevlar (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)