Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Academy/Improving articles
B-class criteria chart
The criteria for promotion to B-class are stated in both the stub section and B-class section in slightly different wording. Why not delete one of them? Yoenit (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's been 14 years and user: Yoenit is no longer active, but the question remains. Why is the B-class criteria written out twice?
- WendlingCrusader (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Audit review
[edit]Hi, @User:TomStar81, I have started an unofficial review of the Academy IAW our proposed audit. I see you were the creator of this page. My edits are largely ce. I have added a few links, expanded slightly on some detail and removed some "redundant" detail. You might want to review what I have done for any errors or typos and anything you think could be better. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 08:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, @User:AustralianRupert, got your thank for my edits. If you had a close enough look to QA my edits (typos, spelling errors or omissions) you might comment as a reviewer? Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, made a few changes. I removed a rather large paragraph which concerned me regarding the project discouraging GA reviews. GA reviews are an important part of article development, IMO, and as a community wide assessment process very important in ensuring that our articles receive an outside review prior to FAC. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Looks good. Regarding the jettisoned article, that was written back when GA standards were a little more lax and the A-Class reviwes had more people working them. Now that everything is uniformly slow, it doesn't really hold the relevance it once did. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Review closed. Cinderella157 (talk) 12:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)