Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Michigan/Assessment

Re-assessment request

_{I would like an assessment of Kinawa Middle School a stub i have been working on. Thank You Somekofootball (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Old assessment requests

If no one objects, I will shortly remove assessment requests which were completed more than six months ago. I don't think there's a need to have old completed assessment requests remain on the page, and removing them will make it easier to spot those that still need doing. cmadler (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm boldly doing this. cmadler (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to do this yet again. casualdejekyll (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

assessments! woo!

Just assessed 100 articles in one session. That should significantly cut down on the unassessed categories. casualdejekyll (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On cities and importance

There doesn't appear to be any specific rules for importance assessment in terms of cities, like for example WP:WikiProject Cities/Assessment has. This just leads to confusion, especially since importance of cities is one of the few importance topics that could almost be automatically determined (not entirely, because there are always exceptions) by things like population, county seat status, and probably some other things I can't think of. I decided to be bold and change the importance of Saginaw from Low to Mid, on the basis that Saginaw is of Mid-Level importance to the WikiProject, in my opinion. I'd like to know, from you all, 1. what are your criteria for importance of cities, if any? and 2. Do you think we should establish cities importance criteria for the entirety of WikiProject Michigan, to reduce the ambiguity? (For clarification, I'm not saying we should use the WikiProject Cities criteria, because obviously what counts as important worldwide is different to what counts as important statewide.) casualdejekyll (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]