Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Hematology-oncology task force/Archive 1

Creation

This is a new task force and many tasks still need to be completed. Help would be appreciated. See WP:MEDTF#Task_force_creation_guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyrol5 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 21 October 2009

The "Pages" tasks have all been completed. Does anyone know the status of the other three (categories, templates, announcements)? WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the "Templates" tasks and will create some of the categories. I named the parameter for {{WPMED}} "hemonc", but maybe it should be something different. The other task forces' parameters use a single whole word, but if just "hematology" or "oncology" is used, it would be excluding a good portion of this task force's scope. Does anyone have any opinions? "hemonc"? "hem-onc"? "hematology-oncology"? Also, after a very brief search, File:Red White Blood cells.jpg was the first image I came across that could work as an icon for the task force. Let me know if you find a better image. --Scott Alter 05:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found an illustration in the public domain at Wikimedia Commons that I think looks better. It is an illustration of red blood cells. Tyrol5 [Talk] 19:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Scott. "Hemonc" is fine with me. I suppose we ought to find and tag the dozen or so most important articles. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I thought that there already was a wikiproject labeled "Wikiproject:Oncology". I am not to sure if there is a wikiproject for hematology but are you sure we need this task force? - BennyK95 - Talk 19:06, October 21 2009 (UTC)

To my knowledge, there is no such project. I searched it and it came up with no independent project related results. I think that this task force is necessary, as hematology/oncology is a huge area of medicine that needs coverage on this wikiproject. This task force has been discussed before creation and the general consensus was to go ahead and create it. Tyrol5 [Talk] 19:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcuts

WP:HEMONC? WP:ONCOLOGY? Any others that strike people's fancy? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:HEMONC will be just fine, as it incorporates both specialties involved. WP:ONCOLOGY and WP:HEMATOLOGY could also be created, so if people search for a project related to these specialties, they will be redirected here. I will create the shortcuts now. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hematology-oncology articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Hematology-oncology articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer pain nominated for GA

Hi. Letting you know I've nominated Cancer pain for WP:GA. Your thoughts would be very much appreciated at Talk:Cancer_pain#GA_Review. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

A request has recently been made for peer review of List of ineffective cancer treatments, an article which falls within the scope of this project. All and any feedback most welcome. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 09:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer in children: The big picture

Can we talk about some missing, or at least hard-to-find, articles? I ran across Juvenile Leukemia today, which could use some loving attention, and it made me wonder whether a pediatric oncology series might be useful. I'm thinking that the list would run something like this:

Cancer in children -- glioma, medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms tumors, rhabdomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma seem to be common solid tumors[1][2] in the US
Childhood leukemias -- merge Juvenile Leukemia into this redirect
Brain tumors in children -- as a major category of cancer, particularly in neonates

Also, I think that it might be interesting to consider whether adolescent cancer is sufficiently different from prepubescent cancer to warrant a separate article.

But perhaps some of these articles already exist, or other people have ideas about expanding the list? I'm open to information, suggestions, and sources. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:JCW help

There's a new WP:JCW report.

Out of the 500 most highly cited missing journals, here's a few that fall into your scope, or near your scope.

See the writing guide if you need help with those. Some of these might be better as redirects (Guide to redirects). Feel free to remove those which you think are too far from oncology/hematology from the list. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colored the image

I colored the image that we're using in our banner. It's not a very skilled job and I couldn't get a really good carmine color for the red blood cell (please feel free to re-do if you'd like), but the black-and-white image looked so plain next to some of the others, and I thought that this would be a small improvement. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Cancer Research UK

Hi. I represent a team of editors at Cancer Research UK. As some of you may have seen, we're very keen to get involved with editing Wikipedia, and have been chipping away at several of the key pages on cancer and related topics for a few months now. Mike Peel suggested we try to get involved with the Wikiproject Medicine/Hematology-oncology taskforce to step things up a gear - please do get in touch if you're active in this taskforce and have any ideas or thoughts about how we can all work together to make Wikipedia's cancer information the best it can be! We have our own little project page here, please feel free to drop me or any of the other Cancer Research UK editors a message. HenryScow (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The most important guideline here to read is probably this one here that outlines referencing. Typically we either use review articles or major textbooks as refs.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh frozen plasma

Fresh frozen plasma is in need of subject-matter experts, particularly the recently-reverted good-faith addition that I reverted due to readability reasons. See Talk:Fresh frozen plasma#Effectiveness - removed large block of text that didn't make sense there. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archived some threads

I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expert attention

This is a notice about Category:Oncology articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differential DVH

Members of this project are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:03, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AIDS-related lymphoma

There's a note at Talk:AIDS-related lymphoma that says half the article feels 'off'. Does anyone want to have a look? WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]