Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mass spectrometry

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Mass spectrometry and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

References

All articles need more references especially the main mass spectrometry article.--Nick Y. 21:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Up and Running

Most pages in the project seem to be working. Feel free to tweak anything, especially article assessments. --Kkmurray 03:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge to mass spectrometry software

From SEQUEST and MzXML (and redirect from Mascot (software)). I made the new page and copied the info, but left the old pages for now.

I think this is a better organization, although it somewhat differs from general wikipedia practice. I think in this situation, being niche software all for similar purposes and for a specific group of scientists, we can do something better suited for this situation.--Nick Y. 17:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about mass spectrometry software to list of mass spectrometry software in Category:Lists of software? Alternately, the MS bioinformatics software can be summarized in Bioinformatics#Software_tools. There really should be a proteomics equivalent to Sequence alignment software, but if there is, I could not find it. The proteomics article doesn't even have a software section. Regarding the stubs, I found Category:Bioinformatics software which has similarly stubby articles, so SEQUEST and Mascot should probably be cleaned up and re-categorized there. I'll do the latter and think some more about the MS/proteomics software issue. --Kkmurray 17:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generally the issue that comes up in merging these small articles is when they don't quite fit together or are relevant to multiple categories.--Nick Y. 20:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global Dissociation Article Needed?

Lots of stubs for dissociation methods: Blackbody infrared radiative dissociation, Collision-induced dissociation, Infrared multiphoton dissociation, Electron capture dissociation (semi-related De novo repeat detection). There is no current tandem mass spectrometry page. Possible merge cleanup opportunity. --Kkmurray 03:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a tandem mass spectrometry article. I also created a stub for shotgun proteomics, which was linked from mass spectrometry software. --Kkmurray 03:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on updating the tandem MS article, as well as a few others. Leafschik1967 01:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference tools

Here are a couple of great tools for generating references:

Wikipedia template filling - ISBNdb, PubMed, PubChem, etc.
Reference generator - Web page, journal, etc.

--Kkmurray 03:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awards Templates

Two new templates (not mine): Template:Recipients of the Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry Award‎ and Template:Biemann Medal Recipients‎. Lots of bio articles are needed to fill them in. --Kkmurray (talk) 13:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to create a similar template for the Thomson Medal, but I couldn't find the info. Any other awards that are important enough to be mentioned in Wikipedia? I'm working on the bio articles, but I hope to get some help (from others if not from former students/collaborators). It's funny that I had to defend Bowers' notability... Tons of second/third tier football players in Wikipedia and nobody questions their notability. Mgnelu (talk) 06:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some a partial listing of Thomson medal recipients from JMS. The IMSF site has the past four conference reports,[1] but no earlier. The full list will require some digging. JASMS has bio information on Distinguished Contribution and Biemann winners (e.g. Bowers [2]). Issues older than one year are available on-line. The notability bar is pretty high for biography, so you need to have a pretty good stub going to avoid a flag on your new page. Don't forget to put template:WikiProject Mass spectrometry and template:biography templates on the article talk page. That lets other editors know that the article has a home and a group of editors ready to take care of it. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following Kkmurray's example, I created a list of references that prove the notability of some mass spectrometrists who were awarded the Distinguished Contribution Award or Biemann medal (feel free to use them if you work on missing bio articles) [3] Mgnelu (talk) 07:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting these biographies on-line was a great idea. I made a page for Boris Aleksandrovich Mamyrin two days ago and it's now the #3 Google hit and the only English language biography not behind a pay site. --Kkmurray (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From this discussion there seems to be the need of making wiki articles for each notable award. I have created already one for the Biemann Medal, others are needed for the The John B. Fenn Award for a Distinguished Contribution in Mass Spectrometry and the Thomson Medal.Ileresolu (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Insilicos

Hi! Pardon the intrusion. I just came across Insilicos in the backlog and noticed it was associated with this project. I'm wondering if anyone can help with it? I cleaned out a lot of the promotional fluff and merged one of their software -- sourcing what I couldm but I'm totally unfamiliar with their work and don't have enough of an understanding to really write this article. Can someone help? Thanks! TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 15:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a section and removed the expert flag. The page needs expansion more than anything else. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Article: Mass spectrum analysis

On interpretation of EI mass spectra. --Kkmurray (talk) 02:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Electron ionization

Hi, I see this article was classed by this WikiProject as needing a diagram. Would someone mind putting details on that article's talk page about what kind of diagram is requested? Reference to similar diagrams on the web or in standard reference texts would be helpful. thanks, pfctdayelise (talk) 13:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Talk:Electron multiplier. --pfctdayelise (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone Announcements

All WikiProjects are invited to have their "milestone-reached" announcements automatically placed onto Wikipedia's announcements page.
Milestones could include the number of FAs, GAs or articles covered by the project.
No work need be done by the project themselves; they just need to provide some details when they sign up. A bot will do all of the hard work.

Click here for more information or to sign your project up.

I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 22:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MS resolution

Why do the formulae on the page about MS resolution not match those in the IUPAC goldbook? After all, the citation is to the goldbook! It appears the numerator and denominator are reversed. 75.158.158.100 (talk) 04:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that equation was inverted. I just changed it to match the Gold Book. Thanks for pointing it out. --Kkmurray (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive tag

I marked this WikiProject as inactive due to a lack of recent project activity. If this tag was placed in error, simply remove it from the top of the page and mark this project 'active' at the WikiProject Directory, here. Andyo2000 (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the tag to semi-active which I think is more descriptive. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unimolecular ion decomposition

New page added. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GC-MS Applications

I posted this on the talk page for GC-MS, but just in case that doesn't get a lot of action - what do people think about splitting off the Applications section into its own article? Canada Hky (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isobaric labeling

New page added on TMT and iTRAQ. Cwenger (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. As these articles evolve, they will need more general lead sections (this understandability issue applies to quite a few other articles also). --Kkmurray (talk) 04:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass spectrometry articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Mass spectrometry articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolve POV Fork: Kendrick Mass and Kendrick Unit

Request comments on proposed merge of Kendrick unit into Kendrick mass and mend a POV fork. In 1963, Kendrick proposed a scale based on the mass of CH2 = 14.0000.[4] This scale is useful in organic mass spectrometry, particularly in high resolution mass spectrometry of hydrocarbons (see [5]). A Kendrick unit has not been proposed, although a paper published last month uses “Ke” in a manner parallel to the Dalton unit.[6] The basis of the merge is that the Kendrick unit article goes beyond what is stated in the literature and is therefore WP:SYNTHESIS. Kendrick mass is widely accepted and a balanced discussion of a Kendrick unit is appropriate within the Kendrick mass article. Additional discussion on Talk:Kendrick_mass. --Kkmurray (talk) 13:41, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion I have moved it to Kendrick (unit). Kehrli (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that there was a merge consensus and the WP:OR issue needs to be resolved. I opened a RfC to try to get more discussion. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation templates now support more identifiers

Recent changes were made to citations templates (such as {{citation}}, {{cite journal}}, {{cite web}}...). In addition to what was previously supported (bibcode, doi, jstor, isbn, ...), templates now support arXiv, ASIN, JFM, LCCN, MR, OL, OSTI, RFC, SSRN and Zbl. Before, you needed to place |id={{arxiv|0123.4567}} (or worse |url=http://arxiv.org/abs/0123.4567), now you can simply use |arxiv=0123.4567, likewise for |id={{JSTOR|0123456789}} and |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/0123456789 → |jstor=0123456789.

The full list of supported identifiers is given here (with dummy values):

{{cite journal |author=John Smith |year=2000 |title=How to Put Things into Other Things |journal=Journal of Foobar |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=3–4 |arxiv=0123456789 |asin=0123456789 |bibcode=0123456789 |doi=0123456789 |jfm=0123456789 |jstor=0123456789 |lccn=0123456789 |isbn=0123456789 |issn=0123456789 |mr=0123456789 |oclc=0123456789 |ol=0123456789 |osti=0123456789 |rfc=0123456789 |pmc=0123456789 |pmid=0123456789 |ssrn=0123456789 |zbl=0123456789 |id={{para|id|____}} }}

Obviously not all citations needs all parameters, but this streamlines the most popular ones and gives both better metadata and better appearances when printed. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biography pages

I added or updated several mass spectrometrist biographies with fair use images where available:

The scientific contribution sections of many of these pages need expansion. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added Robert R. Squires from {{Biemann Medal Recipients}}. --Kkmurray (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Metal-coded affinity tag and petroleomics. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of mass spectrometry software

List of mass spectrometry software is now in table format with WP:REFSPAM links converted to table entries. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pageview stats

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Mass spectrometry to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometry/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the Tool Labs tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

Greetings WikiProject Mass spectrometry Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometry/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Mass spectrometry.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Mass spectrometry, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mass spectrometry articles needing expert attention has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mass spectrometry articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 01:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]