Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Louisiana/New Orleans task force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive

[edit]

How do we get Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Orleans/Archive 5 and other archive pages to be displayed in the above templates properly? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By moving it to the right place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Orleans/Archive 1, which I've just done. Graham87 17:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to fix the autoarchive command to use archive 5, which needed repair. The new archive 5 has been moved to archive 2, and the command has been fixed to use archive 2. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was caused by copypasting the autoarchive command template without knowing how to use it, when it was set up in 2011 [1]. The counter represents the current archive number. Just making the archive path correct is insufficient. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

[edit]
Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Pikachu (sculpture)

[edit]

AfD: Pikachu (sculpture) ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Effect of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans Hornets

[edit]

Effect of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans Hornets has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 November 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/New Orleans task force. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 18:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Orleans → Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/taskforce/New Orleans – Merge this inactive task force into its state's project as a taskforce. Much like how WP:WikiProject Los Angeles is a task force of WP:WikiProject California. Task force conversion, like how other inactive wikiprojects have been converted into taskforces of wikiprojects of a superset topic. This wikiproject has been inactive-status for a decade[2] -- This would indicate the active wikiproject WP:Lousiana as the parent, instead of drifting under WP:USA; for more focused local discussion -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If this is moved to be a task force then the proper name (based on most task forces) is Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/New Orleans task force. This can be seen by the same example given by the op which leads to Wikipedia:WikiProject California/Los Angeles area task force. Gonnym (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Louisiana/New_Orleans_task_force&oldid=1213300792"