Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lehigh Valley/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Lehigh Valley. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
To-do list
Wow, I hope we can get all these articles created from the to-do list. -- JA10Talk • Contribs 02:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am thinking about joining this project. I think it could benefit from my amazing GA writing skills.--trey 02:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine. By the way, I'm sorry about all the bad blood between us. I have lots of anger issues and may sometimes see something in a different point of view. -- JA10Talk • Contribs 03:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am thinking about joining this project. I think it could benefit from my amazing GA writing skills.--trey 02:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Up for deletion
Guys, Allentown, PA in popular culture is up for deletion. Please see the notice on the article page for link to chime in with your feedback. Obviously, please oppose deletion. Alphageekpa 18:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, maybe they're right, maybe the material contained in the Allentown article works. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 15:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey guys, I do not know really how to do this, or if im in the correct location. But they told me to come to the talk section in regards to my site being deleted. I added www.lhshurricanes.org to Liberty's external links section and it always gets deleted. I looked at the guidlines and I do not understand why it is being deleted still. Anyone with some information would be appreciated. Thank you.
Talk —Preceding comment was added at 02:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Just a reminded that you are using the display=none parameter in {{ArticleAlertbotSubscription}} template at the bottom of your project's main page, losing all benefits of being subscribed to Article alerts. The alerts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Lehigh Valley/Article alerts, which you can transclude wherever you want. Alternatively, you could simply remove the display=none from the template, and the alerts will appears wherever you placed the template. See WP:AAlerts#Subscribing for more details.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
PA Roads needs help
I have a request of the project. Right now, the highways in Pennsylvania (under project WP:Pennsylvania Roads), and well, it is almost dead. We need help expanding over 350 stubs, and it would be very helpful, as some of the more important stuff needs help too. If you could possibly give input, ping me on my talk, or post here. Thanks.3 1/2 years of Mitch32 10:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Lehigh Valley Definition
I recently posted comments on the Lehigh Valley Talk page regarding the opening paragraph of the Lehigh Valley article which defines the Lehigh Valley as the A-B-E metro. I can find no official sources to support this definition and believe it to be incorrect. My POV is that the L.V. is historically defined as Lehigh-Northampton counties plus the Phillipsburg area and that A-B-E metro is a relatively recent development that includes areas that are not part of the Lehigh Valley (Carbon, Bucks, Berks, and sections of Warren outside the P-burg area). The U.S. Census Bureau does not mention Lehigh Valley in association with the metro area, and numerous regional agencies, such as LV Economic Development Corp., LV Visitors & Convention Bureau, and LV Planning Commission, limit their definitions to Lehigh-Northampton. The only exception I've found is Great LV Chamber of Commerce, which includes P-burg but no other areas outside Lehigh-Northampton. A search of the Internet reveals that most .gov and .org hits for "lehigh valley" and "allentown-bethlehem-easton-pa-nj" together are Wikipedia-related; that is, other sites are mirroring WP's un-supported definition. I have several solutions in mind to remedy the problem, but would like feedback before moving ahead. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 17:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- My understanding has always been that the "Lehigh Valley" is A-B-E (or, Lehigh and Northampton County). I see that Warren County, New Jersey has made it's way into the Lehigh Valley "wiki" articles as well. In The Morning Call's "Welcome to the Lehigh Valley", they state "The Greater Lehigh Valley encompasses two counties, Lehigh and Northampton, that together total more than 730 square miles. In that area, we have farms, burgeoning suburbs and cities. We are bordered by the Blue Mountains to the North, the Lehigh Mountain Range to the South, the Delaware River East and rolling farm lands lead us West." No mention of New Jersey. The Lehigh Valley is a nice place, and I'm all for empire-building, so let's find ourselves a source! <grin> Alphageekpa (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the speedy and considerate reply. We share the same basic understanding. The picture is admittedly murky because Lehigh Valley is an informal term, defined by usage and not by the government or some other authority. Fortunately, the trail is long. The earliest source I've found is an 1860 history that includes Lehigh, Northampton, A-B-E and also the Phillipsburg area. To my knowledge, this hasn't changed, and modern sources bear that out (though most ignore P-burg). I also haven't found anything that supports the position that the Valley and MSA are the same. I would appreciate hearing from others before making changes. Meanwhile, I've posted several definitions of the Lehigh Valley on my User page, from what seem to be the latest, most reliable sources on the subject. Allreet (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey all! I've made an article about The Freddy Awards. Please feel free to check it out, make edits, give feedback, etc etc! — Hunter Kahn (c) 03:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania)/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. You are being notified as the talk page has a banner for this project. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to bring this AFD discussion regarding the film Most Valuable Players, a documentary about an award ceremony for high school musical theater. Seeking input. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
List of crossings of the Lehigh River
It would be great to have a List of crossings of the Lehigh River, along the lines of the List of crossings of the Schuylkill River or the List of crossings of the Delaware River, but I do not have the information to make such a list. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
In case anyone wants to review a Lehigh Valley-related GAN, I've nominated Peace Candle for good article. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Lehigh Valley articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Lehigh Valley articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Featured article review for H.D.
I have nominated H.D. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for H.D.
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/H.D./archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)