Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/JD curriculum task force
Appearance
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Notes
[edit]Interesting...I will have to look at this more when I have time. Remember (talk) 21:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thanks for your note. I am however, an undergrad at an Australian institution, thus would not necessarily be competant in matters of American Law. I am, however, willing to give my input where some aspects of Australian Law is concerned. drop me a note Khing (talk) 02:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you sure that we have the right venue?
[edit]Seems like this should be on Wikiversity or WikiBooks and not in a WikiProject Task Force.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I really like this idea, but I am curious about the venue. I'm inclined to say it's fine, but I am not entirely sure. I think it all depends on the goal of this project. If the task force is about putting our class outlines on the CASEBOOK subpages, then I think we entering Wikiversity territory (because Wikipedia is not a textbook, and I think the general goal of a project/task force should be getting information on wikipedia itself, not the wikipedia namespace). On the other hand, as long as the cases listed on the CASEBOOK subpages meet notability guidelines, there is nothing wrong with writing briefs for those cases. Either way, I think it's a good idea to get class outlines into the commons on a wiki somewhere. Stephen LaPorte (talk) 15:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)