Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intellectual property

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Intellectual property, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Intellectual propertyWikipedia:WikiProject Intellectual propertyTemplate:WikiProject Intellectual propertyIntellectual property articles

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. — The Transhumanist 10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Starting a Wikidata project on patents

I'm inviting input on what standard information and in what format might or ought be kept on historic patents on Wikidata. I invite partipants here to join or comment: Wikidata:WikiProject Patents -- econterms (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Intellectual property education

I have just moved "Intellectual property education" to Draft:Intellectual property education. The article is a conundrum, as it basically replicates material in the main articles on intellectual property in a format apparently intended to serve as a how-to, rather than a proper article. The article as written has nothing original to the topic, and virtually no content on intellectual property education as a topic at all. I am really not at all sure what to do about this, or whether anything can be salvaged from this article at all. bd2412 T 20:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal to make a database of historic Chilean patents

I am submitting a grant proposal to WikiCite to fund development of a wiki with specialized information on historic Chilean patents up to 1910. Comments, critiques, suggestions, and endorsements are welcome. For extended comments please use the talk page there. -- econterms (talk) 15:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Free content listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Free content to be moved to Open content. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Template:Don't know listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:Don't know to be moved to Template:Don't know license. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Template:Don't know listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:Don't know to be moved to Template:Don't know license. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Free license listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Free license to be moved to Open license. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Requested move at Talk:Free license#undefined

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Free license#undefined that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. _signed,511KeV ^(talk) 07:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance in patent law needed to rescue an article

Honeywell, Inc. v. Sperry Rand Corp. is a 2006 article which has a list of general references and only one specific reference (to trial court Findings of Fact, etc.), which is now broken. Apparently this is an important case patent law, and if so, the article deserves better. (And it surely did not deserve the editorializing about "judicial fiat".[1])

Kablammo (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Open-source software converted to a proprietary license has been nominated for discussion

Category:Open-source software converted to a proprietary license has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]