Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India/Peer review

Isn't it better if there is peer review of all Peer review nominations in Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Article_alerts rather than having people search this specific page to get a Peer review done? Is there any need for a different page for the same? --Vinay84 (talk) 07:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting stubs

Hello Peer Reviewers. I work with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors who attempt to copy-edit all articles so marked. We've encountered a seemingly endless stream of unreferenced, un-infoboxed, stub articles in highly fractured language, covering small villages, minor festivals, temples, etc. Many are so poorly written that they're unintelligible. While we have done our best (and have edited hundreds of such stubs), the result is unsatisfying to us and to any subsequent reader.

Rather than copyedit them, I propose that they be sandboxed until they're in some kind of shape. An alternative would be to merge them into their nearest "parent" article until enough content accumulates (beyond a few sentences) to be of distinct interest to someone.

I'd appreciate your thoughts. If I should repeat this request in another forum, please let me know.

Lfstevens (talk) 21:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]