Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/College soccer task force/Team season
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Football/College soccer task force/Team season page. |
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Improvements
[edit]I noticed there isn't a schedule section on the template. Also do you want to add a goal scorers table to go with the discipline table? swimmer33 17:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sure! That can work, it would align with the WP:FOOTY template. Feel free to adjust the template as you wish. Quidster4040 (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
References
[edit]For the rankings reference, I can't find an archived version of the pages. It doesn't matter while the season is in progress, but it is difficult to go back in time and verify results. Does anyone have a solution to this for both TDS and Soccer Coaches polls? swimmer33 17:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have found & used archived polls on United Soccer Coaches... Don't know how far back they go, though, 'cause I've only looked back a couple of years... GWFrog (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Polls
[edit]Right off the bat, the NSCAA became the USC last year.
The main Coaches' Poll was conducted by the Intercollegiate Soccer Coaches Association of America (ISAA) from 1971 to 1995. The NSCAA took it over in 1996.
The #2 most influential poll was by Soccer America, but they stopped doing a post-season poll after 2013. And now, they want you to pay to see their pre-season & weekly polls.
Currently, College Soccer News' poll is probably on a par with Top Drawer Soccer's.
A horse of a different color is Hero Sports' ratings, which are more RPI-based standings than a poll.
GWFrog (talk) 01:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm open to using either of those polls. I used the TDS polls and USC polls because I could easily find their rankings, and they were used previously on some season pages I found. swimmer33 11:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think we could set up in the page to only require a USC poll, but then set up the template to include CSN and TDS. I think if Hero Sports just uses RPI it isn't as necessary, unless of course we want to create a parameter that shows a program's RPI throughout the season. Quidster4040 (talk) 00:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Incoming players
[edit]What's the difference? Players coming in to the team via transfer are the same as the recruiting class in that they're both new to the team. In my opinion, these should probably be merged into one "Incoming players" section, similar to how there is one "Departures" section which doesn't differentiate between "Signed to go pro", "Drafted by 3rd division Venezuelan team", or "Going pro in something other than sports". GauchoDude (talk) 23:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- @GauchoDude: That's fair, and it would reflect the club season article used in WP:FOOTY. Quidster4040 (talk) 00:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)