Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Vandalism by 201.19..

Originally noted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Content_vandalism. -Stevertigo (t | c) 21:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case

As one of the editors that has been tracking Pé de Chinelo for a few years now it should be noted that this mess has gone beyond his MO of 2009-11. He used to fixate on genre and abusing long time productive editor Andrzejbanas. IMO it is a mistake to think that people who don't have Wikipedia's best interests at heart won't evolve in the ways that they chose to disrupt the project, still, this might be someone else. In any event whether this is Pé or a different person living in Rio we need to clean up their mess and I can't give Lambiam enough thanks for making it easier for us to do this by creating this page. MarnetteD | Talk 01:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Came upon this user created last Feb who is now blocked. Exact same editing pattern and name fits likely Brazilian so I'm adding this here to keep together any others that we come across Marcos Marcelino dos Santos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Other editors please feel free to add any others you might discover. MarnetteD | Talk 23:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And another one Mateus Marcelino dos Santos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for the collection. MarnetteD | Talk 20:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing edits

For some reason not all edits by 201.19.*.* are always shown (although most are). At least this and this edit were not included in the list. In the latter case the absence from this list actually caused me to miss it and mark the article clean too early. --hydrox (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also spotted some. To make the list, I used Special:Contributions/201.19.*, which gave more than 15,000 edits from more than 5000 IP addresses on about 7000 different non-talk pages. Listing all 15,000 edits would have given an unmanageable list, so I had to make a preliminary selection. As far as I can see the pattern of vandalistic edits started in March 2011, and only concerns film-related pages (usually articles, but sometimes also templates). I made a list of "dubious" IP addresses, being those IP addresses from which edits fitting the pattern (in the "bad" period from March 2011 onwards, on film-related pages) have been made. Obviously, I've overlooked some. There are also many edits in that period on pages related to sports or radio stations that I skipped. The edits on the list given at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Vandalism by 201.19.*.*#The list are not necessarily all film-related; they are simply those made during the "bad" period from some IP address on the "dubious" list.

I'll recheck the addresses that edited during the "bad" period and are not on the "dubious" list. --Lambiam 15:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added quite a few missing edits – more than I had expected. (Probably I still overlooked some; it will not hurt to look at a page's history to see if there are unlisted 201.19 edits.) Unfortunately, some pertain to articles that had already been checked and declared clean; to be on the safe side I've marked them again as suspect. But I've marked the separate edits that were previously checked, to show that these do not need to be rechecked. --Lambiam 01:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your continuing work on this. I had noticed a couple that weren't marked. I added the first one I came across to the list but I think I just checked the others when I was in the edit history for the articles. MarnetteD | Talk 02:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

201.19.79.96

All of the edits by 201.19.79.96 were reverted last June by observant editor Nymf. All of those articles can be stricken. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 19:38, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrulations!!!!

I've just seen this now, it is a shocking attack on Wikipedia! Much more dangerous than the immature vulgarities most editors insert!

Thank you and congruglations to all involved. Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]