Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters/Assessment

Stubs and sources

Hello, I've asked this question a few places but have yet to get definitive feedback. Any guidance is appreciated.

I'm looking for clarification on stub articles vs. non-stub articles and the requirement of sources. Can an article without any reliable sources be considered anything but stub class? (Start or above)? The reason I believe they need at least one source is that the Start class description states "article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide sources to establish verifiability." (I see the assessment guidelines here have added the work "enough" sources). I have been told by another editor that start class articles don't need sources, and I am confused. Where does it say this, and if this is the case, should the assessment scale for start be changed accordingly to be a little more clear?

I've asked at WP:STUB, Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment and the wikiproject I've been working on, WP:SOAPS, but haven't gotten a lot of feedback and am looking to find the definite answer. Thanks for your help. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback wanted on 'Draft:Newt Scamander'

I have recently been working on Draft:Newt Scamander and have also submitted it for review. I want feedback on the draft to know if it needs improvement or cleanup, to prevent the draft from getting declined. I am a new editor so it would be helpful if an experienced editor helps me ensure that Draft:Newt Scamander meets Wikipedia's notability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech2009Girl (talk • contribs) 11:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]