Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disability/Assessment

Importance rating questions

Should Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities be rated High or Top? Roger (talk) 10:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. :) - Hordaland (talk) 13:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A totally useless answer! Roger (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But true. Sorry if it caused offence. Hordaland (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I shouldn't let my grumpiness affect my Wikiediting like that. I've given it a High rating, we can of course revise it anytime. Roger (talk) 07:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible disability

I've added the banner to a few pages, including Invisible disability. It is a poor start class, but I gave it importance=Mid, hope that's OK. Tell me if I should register it somewhere or something; I've never added project banners before. Cheers, Hordaland (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 article

I changed the rating of this article to High, then Hordaland posted a message to my Talk page with an objection - User_talk:Dodger67#ADA_importance - so I suggested we should discuss it here. Upon reflection I think even though it is a subject affecting only one country, it is talked about even outside the US. Maybe its a candidate for a Mid importance rating? Roger (talk) 09:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]