This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This is the first archive for past discussions in the now WikiProject Darwen Holdings. It starts at the creation of WikiProject ELCB on 25 January 2005, and list all discussions until just before WikiProject Darwen Group was renamed on 13 March 2008. To see current discussions, click here.
If anyone can get the template below to the top of the page, please do so. Help would be greatly appreciated!
Unisouth, I have created "Template:WP ELCB|this template" (now this template: Template:WP Darwen Holdings) and put it on all the East Lancs articles, but I can't get it to stay at the top of this page of the main East Lancs talk page. Also, please feel free to improve it, I made a very basic one. (Now moved up) -- Arriva43618:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the East Lancs subsidiaries section I added to the East Lancs article (logos too), the preview of the new look ELC website implies thier will be more detailed sections of the subsidiaries. For now, I've created stubs for:
Just to say I am having these deleted as they are way out of date and I have lost track with them. I know this is the archive but I don't want people to think they still exist. Arriva436talk18:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have made this infobox for use on East Lancs bus articles, and have put it on the Esteem and Olympus articles. However, some aspects of it don't work and display (example) "{{{passenger capacity}}}" instead of "33 to 60", when the other specification information displays properly. I can not see the difference in the code to make the infobox between ones that work and ones that don't. So if someone can fix them, it would be brilliant.
All the imformation I wanted to put up is there, but doesn't want to display.
As can be seen on the Lolyne, Esteem and Olympus articles, I went to the 2007 Cobham bus gathering held at Longcross and managed to get photos of the nearside of the Lolyne (as oppsosed to the offside of the Yellow buses one), and (I put into the article infoboxes) an Esteem and Olympus. This is good as it helps illustrate the buses without the need for the external link "Here is a picture of a ..." at the bottom. And ilustrating the buses helps with the confusion of ELC's confusing name pattern!
The only problem is that the Esteem is such a 'high quality' scan that the red paintwork 'blotches' a bit when the image is small. Here though, it is fine!
If anyone can find/upoload any more of their ELC bus pictures, it would be great!
As can be seen on my user page, I have uploaded a lot of photos and put them on many articles. It took ages!
I've added these to the template (since they seem obvious ones to consider doing next), though I don't know that much about them so haven't started the actual articles.
OK, I've now done very basic stubs for the MaxCi and the European, along with pictures, which are rather low-res but are better than nothing as a "starter for ten". I have said very little about them because I know very little -- indeed, I always thought the European was low-floor until, whilst attempting to do some research on Google, I found several photos clearly showing them to be step-entrance! I always thought that the whole point of the "L" at the end of L113CRL (where there would otherwise be a B) was low-floor... Am I at least right that the MaxCi is low-floor? (Surely they wouldn't have registered the first one "L3 LOW" if it wasn't!) Quackdave23:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure I've heard the double-deck body that looked like the Alexander R Type (examples: Nottingham 349-353, 481-492) called by a single letter name - was it E Type? (A quick search on Google suggests my memory to be correct for once!)
However, I've never heard a name for the distinctive double-deck body built during the 1980s, with the downward-sloping front upper deck window bay, double-curvature upper deck windscreen, and wraparound lower deck windscreen. (Examples: most Leicester Dominators from B reg to F reg; G6xx EKA; H6xx GPF). I have heard it called "the coach style body" or equivalent, but that's misleading since many were buses (even early ones like Leicester's 79-83). Does it have a proper name? If not, what should we call it? "East Lancs 198x double-deck body" perhaps? (With x replaced by the confirmed year of introduction!)
- Quackdave19:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update: from the research I've done online, it looks like the first ones were built in 1984, and the last in 1991. So maybe "East Lancs 1984-1991 double-deck body" ? (Bit of a long title, but necessary to avoid ambiguity? - unless it turns out to have a name!) Quackdave22:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, lots of East Lancs bodies seem to just be called "East Lancs" with no particular body name (helpful on wikipedia!), so I think that name should be OK.
Just to say that I have been busy recently, so have not been on Wikipedia as much, so edits for this project on my behalf have slowed down a bit. Hopefully, I will be able to edit a bit more soon. So all your edits Quackdave are very helpful Thank you Arriva43616:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I think I've changed my mind about including the end date of 1991 though, since I'd forgotten about the rebodied Volvo B58 that Skill's had, which according to buslistsontheweb.co.uk has a date of 7/1993, presumably for entering service. Now I vaguely remember that Skill's may have had some delay recertifying it, issues with weight distribution springs to mind? Anyway, without being certain I think "1984 style" is probably safer, and will go for that. Quackdave11:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What the book has to say rather muddies the Spryte/Flyte/Opus 2 situation. It states that the difference between the Spryte and Flyte is size, rather than entry height, referring to them as "the Spryte midibus and 12m Flyte", and stating that merely "most" Sprytes are low floor and "most" Flytes are step-entrance.
Clearly, the vast majority are either low-floor/midi-size or full-size/step-entrance, which is presumably how the confusion arose. Which vehicles could actually make a difference? According to my perusal of BusListsOnTheWeb, the only ones I can find are:
Nottingham's rebodied Volvo B6, M511 TRA, a step-entrance midibus;
SELB's six MAN 18.220s, (presumably) full-size vehicles which (could be) low-floor.
(N.B. The MAN NL222FR, registered N222 LFR, is clearly pictured here with a Spryte badge; is this a full-size vehicle? I can't tell from the pic - but if it is, then presumably it confirms the original position.)
I would say the MAN is full size. And just in a new edit, I just remembered that I thought MAN have only made full size buses until their more recent plans, and this bus is an "N"-reg. However, don't take my word for it yet!Arriva43615:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The book also states that "Delaine of Bourne has two Flyte-bodied B10Ms with EL2000 windscreens"; but isn't that the same thing as an Opus 2? (Unfortunately it makes no mention of the Opus 2 in the text). Maybe they renamed it, but then built two more before introducing the new front end?
Well, as I said, East Lancs can't seem to go straight from one model to another (i.e) Make one, stop making it, make a new model. This is proved by the new models, the Olympus was launched quite a while ago, and the last Myllenuim double deckers are being built NOW (As I type this!).Arriva43615:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed the articles to say that the Delaine vehicles are Flytes rather than Opus 2s, since that's what the published source tells us. However I think I probably will end up writing to East Lancs to see if they will provide definitive confirmation! Actually, maybe these two articles could be merged, any opinions? Quackdave14:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I don't think they should be merged just yet, because to the passenger the varing fronts would look different to the passenger! (It's just typical of East Lancs to compilicate things with the Flyte/Opus 2). - Also, I'm just about to add that East Lancs has just recently been saved from administration on the main East Lancs page -- Arriva43609:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Next, it calls the high-floor version of the Myllennium the "Hyline" rather than the "Hyview". A search on Google suggests that the only occurrences of "Hyview" come from our articles; but the only occurrences of "Hyline" come from AltBus, an online forum which appears to be a "fantasy bus operation" role-playing game, and which generally evokes my hostility by contaminating Google search results for real-life registration numbers! Anyway, that makes it two-against-one in favour of "Hyline". Perhaps this is a fairly important one to resolve soon...
Problem solved
I've never heard of the "Hyline", and anyway it sounds American, not from Blackburn! Perhaps you could contact East Lancs themselves for some history! Someone may have got it wrong, (i.e. I've heard someone call somthing the Mylleunium Spryte, which doesn't exist (althought it would be good to prevent confusion over Mylleniums!))Arriva43615:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I've found an answer to this one at least. At archive.org there are archived copies of the ELCB corporate website going back to 2001; this one gives us the answer. Hyline it is. (Though I have to say I think Hyview would have been a better name!) Quackdave18:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, there's a photo of a Stagecoach-liveried MAN single-decker clearly displaying "KINETIC" on the number plate - in spite of this and this clearly showing the spelling as Kinetec! AAARGH! I wish they'd make their minds up!
My mind is now hopelessly fuddled. On the one hand, I'd like to believe that the book is right, but on the other hand, there are statements elsewhere in it that I know are wrong, so it clearly isn't 100% accurate. But then, Wikipedia isn't about what's right, it's about what's verifiable in "reliable sources"... so, any opinions? (Or does anyone fancy a trip to Bourne, Barnsley, Dundee or Northern Ireland to see if any of those key vehicles have a badge on them? :-)
Stagecoach - this is in Stagcoach livery and has an "I" on the reg plate
Single deck demo - this has an "I" on the reg plate and and "E" on the side branding
Double deck demo - this has and "I" on the reg plate but "E"'s on the side branding and windscreen.
From that, I would conclude that it is an "E" and they have just made a typo on the reg plate. However this does its best to flaw the argument, look at the destination screen! (And also the author of the picture's called it a "Kentic" but that's different...)
After a look into BUSES Magazine, they seem to have called it the Kinetic, and most enthusiast websites are calling it the Kinetec. Obvisously Unisouth's Wikipedia article of it is "Kinetec". And I hadn't even noticed the change!
I think the only way to find the solution to this is to ask East Lancs, made helpful by the fact they don't yet have a complete website and have no e-mail address!
The page is getting very cluttered and I think that with the increase in information and lots more I have found for it, the article could do with being split up into maybe "East Lancs Myllennium Single Decker" and "East Lancs Myllennium Double Decker" Does anyone have any views on this? -- Arriva43617:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree they should be split. The Spryte and Lolyne have separate articles, as do the Flyte and Pyoneer; so the Myllennium and Myllennium Lolyne should too.
As for what to call them, I'd say keep the existing name for the single decker. "East Lancs Myllennium" by itself does after all refer to the single decker. The double decker isn't quite as clear cut: could go for "East Lancs Myllennium Lolyne", on the basis that "East Lancs Lolyne" covers all of the pre-Myllennium versions together, and therefore forms the start of a convention; or, as you suggest, "East Lancs Myllennium double decker" (or possibly "deckers"). (The "D"s of "double decker" should be lower case though, to fit in with the standard WP naming convention.)
One of those italicised disambiguation lines could be put into the existing article for good measure:
This article refers to the single deck bus body. For double deckers with the name Myllennium, see (Whatever it's called).
Yeah, or perhaps they could be in their "proper" names of Lolyne, Lowlander and Vyking, this maybe slightly more confusing to create but clearer to read in the articles. Then again this would make it eaiser to put in the infoboxes with the slightly different specifications on each one.
Regarding the capital "d's" - I was in a rush :) Any more opinions and I'll press ahead. -- Arriva436 , 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I guess it would be neater for each to have its own page - though the template will be getting quite full! Or yet another alternative - instead of six separate pages, make three by splitting up the Lolyne, Lowlander and Vyking, but include the Myllennium version of each along with the "parent" version? (I don't know how well the infobox specs would fit in with that, though... are they the same?) Quackdave20:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing not yet comleted are the infoboxes and specifications, as the intrenet archive machine currently doesn't work! I will try to do this asap. Also, the disambiguation line you mention is it bit big, so that may need narrowing down. -- Arriva43617:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Now, any ideas as to good places to get photos of the missing ones? Blackpool seems to have Myllennium Lolynes, which is not too far from me (I'm in Liverpool), so I'll see if I can make it up there in the next month or two. I can't find any mention of any Vykings or Myllennium Lowlanders in the North West, though.
It would appear that no Lowlanders (as distinct from Myllennium Lowlanders) were ever built! Bus & Coach Recognition says they all have the Myllennium front, and searching for photos (using registration numbers from BusListsOnTheWeb) would seem to back this up. It's sod's law that I only found that out after you'd created the article, sorry about that! Do you reckon it should be redirected to Myllennium Lowlander instead? Quackdave19:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the Lowlander problem is fixed, go to the article and spot the difference! I've just said it was the planned name as that is true. Regarding photos, the Lolyne, Myllennium (single deck) and Myllennium Vyking already have photos. So we need:
Myllennium Lowlander - I know Arriva have loads in The Midlands (don't get caught out by their numerous Volvos in Yorkshire though!), but I can't get their in the near future.
Vyking - It would seem acording to: this and this that Trandev Yellow buses' fleet no. 411 - 418 are Vykings, in addition to their many Lolynes. I could probably get a picture of one of these soon unless you find another examples somewhere else! -- Arriva43609:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes, if you ever see a rare East Lancs/Scania OmniTown we need a photo of that to, so that the difference between and OmniTown and City can be ilusrated.
I'm going to Derby this weekend, and it looks as though nine of Arriva's Myllennium Lowlanders are allocated to Derby, so I'll try and get one. As for OmniTowns, Nottingham have several, and I'll be going there within the next month or two as well. Quackdave18:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK! My parents decided at the last minute to suggest meeting up in Whaley Bridge, instead of at their home in Derby, so my visit to Derby is postponed. I now hope to go there in three weekends' time, probably at the same time as I do Nottingham. Quackdave19:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Right then! The Bournemouth photo should come around in the next 6 or so weeks, but in the meantime I have got this photo of Solent Blue Line's Myllennium Vyking open top - now on the M.Vyking article. P.S. We don't need an open top varition for each one - there aren't any! -- Arriva436 , 16:41 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I finally managed to get down to the Midlands, and got a photo of an OmniTown and a Myllennium Lowlander. Neither is ideal, the first being taken on a dull overcast day, and the second being taken out of the windscreen of a moving coach! (I wasn't driving it, I hasten to add.) However I think they are both better than no image at all.
I also got a European and a Pyoneer. Again they were not taken under ideal conditions, but I think they are still better than the previous ones, if only thanks to the much higher resolution. Therefore I've replaced these images too.
That's good, all the pictures seem to be fine to me. On the TYB front, I have been to Bournemouth, but with only 8 buses of a large fleet, and with no knowlege of their particular allocation, I didn't see any!! Still, I might be back there sooner or later.... ---- Arriva436 , 1st October 2007(UTC)
East Lancs has been taken over by the Darwen Group, does this mean it is the end of the East Lancashire Coachbuilders name? Unisouth11:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at the moment, no one is quite sure, and most people are calling them "East Lancs (Darwen)"! There hasn't been much official information about a name change and I wouldn't take any action on wikipedia until there has been. However this photo at Coach and bus live does have a Darwen Group board. Also, the "G" on the destination display is their logo.
So I think that in a few weeks or so, the name will come out as Darwen and we will need to change everything! Would I would do is rename articles of current ELC models "Darwen Group Esteem" etc, and leave past models the same. The main article would have to change too. Any article that does change will need information about East Lancs and thier demise, as well as any article keeping the title of East Lancs needing info about Darwen.
But until a name change is known, I'd leave it. I have yet to see a new website for the new comapany (oh, yes, the current East Lancs one is indeed still under construction!) -- Arriva43616:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I've just thought, Buses Magazine is out this week, so once I/we get that a dedcision can be reached, according to what they say. -- Arriva43616:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly a website of someone who has visited East Lancs says that it has been renamed 'Darwen Group East Lancs' and 'Darwen Group North West' [1]. --T.A Stevenson21:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, blimey! The other people saying it's called Darwen are saying it's just called "Darwen Group"!!! Omnibuses said "Its decision to sweep aside any reference to the former, troubled East Lancs name was deliberate" [2] so there is still a lot of confusion. As I said before I think we'll just have to wait until something definate is found out! -- Arriva43616:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah thanks! In one of my Wikipedia "disasters" !!, I only realised this half way through changing everything. I think I corrected everything, but some could have slipped the net! -- Arriva43619:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I more information of Darwen's takeover had come about, I think it's time to change the information (see above). This is what has been done so far:
Template:ELCB Buses - changed title from East Lancs buses to East Lancs/Darwen, and also added Darwen Panaire. Buses now with articles of both their East Lancs and Darwin names have had this marked
Information may be missing for the next couple of days as the project transfers into WP:DG. You will not have to re-register or replace the project templates. Unisouth (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good, I was wondering whether this should be done. Also, thanks Unisouth for making the Darwen Group article.
Finally, slightly off-topic but I've just removed Gherkin30's name from the list of members as he got banned. (I wont say why but you can tell exactly why if you look at his last contributions!!!!) -- Arriva436 (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as I'm not very good with uploading files (logos and my own pictures are the limit!), I was wondering whether any other pictures can be put on. I have seen some pictures that have been uploaded with the right license from Flickr. I have found a photo of a East Lancs Vyking and East Lancs Myllennium Lolyne, which there are no pictures of yet, which have this licence. It it OK to upload these if you do what it says on the link?
Is it possible to tweak the infobox so that an image caption can be displayed if wanted? It's just that I have added an image (from the commons) of an East Lancs Olympus on a Scania chassis to that article, and said it has a Scania chassis. However, currently, there is no good way of saying how the picture in the infobox has a Vovlo chassis. For the time being, I have just put the image caption in the image box, as in East Lancs Esteem, but this looks terrible and makes everything go off-centre!!
Just to say I have done this to all of the problem infoboxes and added image captions to some, which makes them look much better. Thanks once again! -- Arriva436 (talk) 19:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have recently added two new sections to the template, listing the subsidiaries of Darwen and previous ones of East Lancs. This I hope provides a wider view of the company, by not just listing the products. I have adjusted the title accordingly to omit the "buses", but have left the template name the same for the moment in case I page move miraculously takes the template off all the articles. Thanks, Arriva436 (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to this and this, Optare have been taken over by Darwen Holdings chairman Roy Stanley. Someone has added this to the appropriate articles, and put Optare in a new "related companies" section in the East Lancs/Darwen template.
Does anyone have any thoughts on whether this WikiProject should be expanded to cover the Optare articles, or any other ideas?? -- Thanks, Arriva436shout!21:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if we expanded and had to change the name, I'd say "Darwen Holdings", as that seems to be the parent company and should cover if they decide to buy anything else!! -- Arriva436shout!16:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To reflect on our "new start", with the inclusion of Optare to the project, following the Darwen Holdings takeover of them, I have archived all the discussions we have had so far. These can of course still be seen on the link on the right. Arriva436talk21:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I see that Unisouth has changed the article template so that Optare products should continue to have this template and Darwen Group buses this template, which I agree with. Merging them would in my opinion make the Navbox way too big! Arriva436talk22:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As this project has gone quite for a bit (the loads of bus related stuff coming at the same time has gone, now we have to wait...), I thought it might be a good idea to bring this to your attention:
The main reason for this post is about this template. It is the latest version, showing all the new images etc. However, two similar templates currently exist. This one (Template:WP ELCB) and this one (Template:WP Darwen Group), I have made redirect to the newer version, so that the transclusions display the new version too.
Well, I think it is best to copy the WP Darwen Holdings template code onto the WP ELCB template page thus all the articles tagged with both these templates will have the same template style. UNI|SOUTH19:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have sort of done that in redirecting them to the newer template, in that they all display the correct version. I was just thinking that it would be easier to keep one version updated, rather than 3! Arriva436talk16:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, a have gone on all the pages with the "WP Darwen Group" template and changed it to the newer version, so now "WP Darwen Group" is no longer used. Can I get it deleted it if no one minds? Only 7 pages used this template so it wasn't much of a problem. Now we have two... Arriva436talk17:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well then in that case, simply put {{WP Darwen Holdings}} on the old template pages then when WP Darwen Holdings gets updated they all will! Then if that don't work we will have to get a bot to replace all the tags! UNI|SOUTH17:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK then. I will slowly go through all the pages using the old template and replace it. it should be easy enough, and then we will have one standard template. Arriva436talk18:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done!! I have now replaced all examples of the old templates and replaced them with the new. All that needs to be done now is for the templates to be deleted. I have tagged them, but it has to be seven days before they go! Arriva436talk10:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm at it, can anyone find any more info they (or I if there's a link) can add to the
Optare Prisma pages, it's a bit blank at the moment, and probably wouldn't be seen as notable. Arriva436talk10:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps WikiProject Optare plc then! In the meantime, I have updated Template:Optare Buses to show everything, and for the meantime I have redirected Template:ELCB Buses to it. The new Optare buses template isn't perfect but is OK to be used on pages I think. Basically, some of the lists are in alphabetical order, while others are in product era date order. The former East Lancs section is also mixed, in date order but with single- and double-decks separate. Arriva436talk18:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Discovered today that everything seems to have been completed. The Darwen website redirects to the Optare one. The Optare site also has a new logo, which I have uploaded and put in the Optare article infobox. I moved the old logo into the history section, because it shows the old look, and also the logo has been in that sort of shape ever since the company has started.
Our new logo! WikiProject Optare has now recieved its second logo! If anyone can make it transparant I would be most grateful. UNI|SOUTH17:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. I see that someone has moved Darwen Esteem and Darwen Olympus to Optare Esteem and Optare Olympus. This cocks everything up, as last time a name changed we did separate articles (e.g. East Lancs Visionaire and Darwen Visionaire are separate. Amy suggestions, should I revert it and create the new articles? Otherwise everything regarding the templates and structure gets confusing, already the Esteem and Olympus have been removed from the Darwen section of Template:Optare Buses, which is very wrong, they still are discontinued Darwen buses.
Whilst you have a fair point that it's always good to invite discussion before making non-trivial changes, in this instance I do believe that the changes are a step in the right direction. IMHO, the template is needlessly cluttered by the duplication of models across marques, and indeed arguably incorrect, since the Olympus and Esteem are not in any sense "discontinued". I would suggest this as a neater alternative.
In the same way, I would argue that additional articles for the same vehicle simply being rebadged are superfluous, and would even go so far as to merge East Lancs Olympus into Optare Olympus as follows:
The Optare Olympus (originally sold as the East Lancs Olympus, and for a brief period as the Darwen Olympus) is a bus body [...]
I would present the Plaxton Pointer as a good analogy, which has at various points been badged as:
I agree with what you are saying here. I was never saying that separate names were the best thing, just saying that when the editior did change them they cocked up the scheme we had at the time.
The real problem is East Lancs themselves. Before the administration, their naming pattern was confusing enough anyway, but the stages that followed have confused the matter further.
As long as the fact that the names were previously used can be kept clear in the articles themselves and the main articles, I would have no problem with them being merged. The advantage of separate article is that is makes it obvious that they had separate names. As long as you think you could make it clear, go ahead! I would suggest dates for each names and images of the different buses explained well, i.e. 1 (E.L.) and 2 (Darwen). (Incedentally due to the changes 2 is in the wrong place!)
Your suggested template looks good, when I made the existing one it was an attempt to clear everything up quickly. If you could try and solve the problem with it given above it would be great too!
The Pointer example is good. (Although I have separate issues that is will always be called the Plaxton Pointer - most of the buses are Plaxton anyway, so the article name seems out-of-touch.) Back on topic, if you think you can merge the article and it would be better - do it!
I'm going on holiday Saturday (determined to get a photo of a foreign bus on here!) so this is a good time to bring it up - as I can comment on it now!! Therefore, I won't be able to help with merging the articles - if you're happy to do it yourself then that's good too, I'll be having something to look forward to when I get back!
OK, I've placed merge banners on the relevant pages (just to make sure no-one thinks of anything else that we have missed), and will proceed in a few days. Quackdave (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've swapped over the template (no further comments having been added) and have started the merging, beginning with the Olympus. I made a few observations on its talk page. It took me a bit longer than I expected, so I'll take a break before continuing onto the Esteem. Quackdave (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
← Excellent work on the Olympus article - it is very clear. I have read the additional comments, very odd! As Unisouth has noted, some Visionaires have entered service with Big Bus Company, so he has moved East Lancs Visionaire to Optare Visionaire. This is now finished (I made some small edits which pleased me anyway!), I have also therefore corrected the issue on the template. I was going to bring this up - but it happened before I had the chance! The Big Bus ones were, assuming this, ordered under the Darwen name but finished by Optare. I have also added this.
Over the next few days I will try and correct links from redirect etc and pipe as necessary to clear things up. Now only the Esteem to go (unless someone actually orders a Panaire!) Arriva436talk21:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see with interest that the Esteem and Solo+ have been removed from the products section on the Optare website, as Unisouth has helpfully mentioned on the respective articles. I presume they have been withdrawn, as the Esteem is one of many Optare single deckers, less popular and to the old EL design (whereas the Olympus is their only 'decker in production), and the Solo+ wasn't exactly a massive success at the NEC.
I think that we just need to keep our eyes open for any further developments. The big changes at Optare have been done so things are quieter here. The Project just needs to plod along making gradual improvements at events unfold!! Arriva436talk/contribs17:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
Done!! I have now replaced all examples of the old templates and replaced them with the new. All that needs to be done now is for the templates to be deleted. I have tagged them, but it has to be seven days before they go! Arriva436talk 10:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
