Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Copyright Cleanup/Allstarecho
Also, we need to check files to see if any problematic images remain. Evidently, some images have already been deleted. These are ready for evaluation. Given their number, I would recommend removal when they've been processed. Unless the article has a complex history, we're probably better off scouring it as we go through immediate removal of any copyright infringing text or revision, where possible. Thoughts? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- "Unless the article has a complex history, we're probably better off scouring it as we go through immediate removal of any copyright infringing text or revision, where possible." I don't understand that sentence. – Quadell (talk) 04:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. It was written from a mistaken assumption of common knowledge. :) When we did GrahamBould, we blanked many of the articles with the copyvio template for later handling, which really lengthened the whole process, since we then had to go back to them. I'm simply suggesting that unless the article is likely to be controversial, it's probably better to clean it as we go. If it's controversial, then we might want to give regular contributors a heads up and offer them an opportunity to help with cleaning. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- "Unless the article has a complex history, we're probably better off scouring it as we go through immediate removal of any copyright infringing text or revision, where possible." I don't understand that sentence. – Quadell (talk) 04:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- All images done: 2 clear copyvios, 1 accidental, a few to ffd. I deleted 5 other images that res, no exif, web quality and a search of talk archives convinced me were 99% webscrapings. All the remainder look ok - Peripitus (Talk) 03:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC).. Sigh - now have to check the commons images - Peripitus (Talk) 03:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)