Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Connecticut/Connecticut article guidelines
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Connecticut/Connecticut article guidelines page. |
|
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
RFC
[edit]Please let me know what you think, what can be added, etc. Thanks! Markvs88 (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Standardized article formats for CT cities
[edit]I feel like the articles on some of CT's major cities such as New Haven and Bridgeport are suffering from a lack of organization and poor structure. These articles do have potential and are already packed with information--maybe too much. There is a lot of trivial information that may not be notable, especially in the New Haven article. Seeing as the articles on our major cities are of top importance, I think it behooves us to follow a reasonably standard format. Looking at the WP: Cities guidelines provides a solution. I would be happy to see some of our cities be nominated to at least A-status. What do you think? Lrkleine (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Lrkleine! I'm all for it, so long as cited points are (re)moved go to sub-articles or at least to the talk page of the article in question for discussion. Most of these are pretty old articles that have had a lot of hands through them, and are probably overdue for standardization. The pre-2 September 2011 Hartford article is another good example, it looked like an ad for Springfield, MA! Best, Markvs88 (talk) 13:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)