Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/WikiGrail/Archive 1

Lutheranism, Effigy

I do not think these four actors need to be considered "articles relevant to this project". They are all marked by someone as part of WikiProject Lutheranism, but there artical makes no mention of there role in Lutheranism nor Lutheranism's role in their lives, nor likewise Christianity. Can with be made to not show up in future lists?

Andy Richter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed
Brian McKnight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed
Gary Cole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed
Kevin Sorbo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed
Ron Livingston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed

Also Effigy is was marked as a Christianity stub for no good reason that I can see. It says "A different type of effigy is used in some religious rituals to represent an undesired person or spirit." It sounds like someone misread this a Christian ritual, but I am not a UK Christian. --Carlaude ^(talk) 18:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think these need to be on the list either. Millenium could just use a paragraph or so, with links to other articles, e.g. Postmillennialism, Premillennialism, and Amillennialism. --Carlaude ^(talk) 09:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kirkpatrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed
Millenium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (stub class) unclaimed

The reason they were included in the first place is, basically, not everything has to be heavy lifting, and it isn't that bad an idea to give people some "lighter" content to work on as well. All those articles got a serious number of hits, and it is basically our purpose to enhance the encyclopedia. That can be done just as much for an extremely popular article about a well known subject as about a obscure theologian or biblical text. John Carter (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can assign points status for anything you want. I just don't see the point of keeping Chris Kirkpatrick, for example, as part of WikiProject Lutheranism. --Carlaude ^talk 01:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]