Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Categories/Category clean up
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Place each category code that is up for discussion into its own section (e.g., == category name==, give a brief reason and sign. Please try to remember to place a collan (:) just before the word "category" (e.g., [[:Category:Addison, Illinois]]. Pknkly (talk) 02:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
Addison is within Chicagoland area and therefore within the Project scope. Pknkly (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Result = The category was added to CHICATBOTS and assessment for Importance and Class was affirmed for Adventureland (Illinois).Pknkly (talk) 03:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Objective is to either retain or delete Chicago Template in Talk page
[edit]Are you saying that these article need to have a category from WP:CHIBOTCATS added to them?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 9:42 pm, Today (UTC−5)
- For those who don't know about CHIBOTCATS - it is where the Chicago Project category codes are placed for the use of bots. Categories, within CHIBOTCATS, that are assigned to articles, is what designates an article as being in scope for the Chicago Project. Tony is asking if all the articles are to be designated as being in scope (i.e., by having their category code is CHIBOTCATS).Pknkly (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Good question. I'll answer here and then copy this (along with your question) into the Category clean up Talk page. Yes, ff the project team editor feels the article is within scope of the Chicago Project. No, if the project editor does not feel the article in scope. If the article is out of scope, the project auditing editor needs to delete the Chicago Project template from the Talk page of the article. Pknkly (talk) 10:12 pm, Today (UTC−5)