Wikipedia talk:Vagueness

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vagueness page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
High	This page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Regulation Change

The regulations have changed and the content of the page is invalid. EME requirements has changed. RS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.180.236 (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell us your conserns

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:8303:af20:1c1c:8d71:609b:e5f6 (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

It appears that this essay covers the same scope as MOS:WTW, to which this page should probably be merged with. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F (talk) 03:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support; merge into #Expressions that lack precision in the corresponding article --Firestar464 (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing unclear

These are subjective qualifications. So be more clear as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 23:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Vague now redirects here

Wikipedia:Vague and WP:Vague now redirect here (to WP:Vagueness). I submitted it on Wikipedia:How to make a redirect ✔

— Massmediazealot (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch ?

I agree with @2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F and @Firestar464 above that these articles overlap and should be merged.

I will add "See also: Wikipedia:Please clarify and Wikipedia:Vagueness" to:

—Massmediazealot (talk) 09:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see at least one situation where vagueness should be allowed

Some of best works of popularizing science include not only results, but also methods to reach those results (e.g. works of Michael Faraday, Isaac Asimov, Carl Sagan, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Richard Feynman).

If I were addressing Feynmann's methods in Wikipedia, and citing his speech when he accepted his Nobel Prize in Physics, where he talked about how he searched for the solutions he was awarded that prize for, I would need to use so called weasel words, and vaguenes, because (s)he used them then.

An example from Feynmann's speech at the banquet then, with most of what might be unclear, tagged:^[1]

Your Majesty,^[who?] Your Royal Highnesses^[which?], Ladies^[who?] and Gentlemen.^[who?]

The work I have done^{[clarification needed]}^[when?] has, already, been adequately rewarded and recognized.^[when?]^{[by whom?]}

Imagination reaches out repeatedly trying to achieve some higher level^[which?] of understanding,^{[clarification needed]} until suddenly^[when?] I find myself momentarily alone before one new corner^[which?] of nature’s pattern of beauty^{[clarification needed]} and true majesty^{[clarification needed]} revealed^{[by whom?]}. That^{[clarification needed]} was my reward.

Then, having fashioned tools^[which?] to make access easier to the new level^[which?], I see these tools used by other men^[who?]{{sexism}} straining their imaginations against further mysteries beyond^[which?]^[where?]. There,^[where?] are my votes of recognition^{[by whom?]}.

How it should be - from Feynmann's speech at the Nobel Banquet:^[1]

Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Ladies and Gentlemen.

The work I have done has, already, been adequately rewarded and recognized.

Imagination reaches out repeatedly trying to achieve some higher level of understanding, until suddenly I find myself momentarily alone before one new corner of nature’s pattern of beauty and true majesty revealed. That was my reward.

Then, having fashioned tools to make access easier to the new level, I see these tools used by other men straining their imaginations against further mysteries beyond. There, are my votes of recognition.

Feynmann was notable as a speaker, and a lecturer of distinction; this quote was taken from his speech published by (and is cited to) a hopefully W:RS publisher.

Please, don't misuse such templates like I did here. And please, don't remove this whole section, if nobody addresses these claims about vagueness etc. for too long (and clears whole section out, as I have seen done in articles by too overburdenend, and a bit fast-fingered, patrollers). Regards,

References

^ ^a ^b Richard P. Feynman. "Richard P. Feynman's speech at the Nobel Banquet in Stockholm, December 10, 1965". The Nobel Prize.

Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 01:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[FeynNobelBanquet-1] Richard P. Feynman. "Richard P. Feynman's speech at the Nobel Banquet in Stockholm, December 10, 1965". The Nobel Prize.

[1]