Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Arts/Cinema

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Userboxes

Wikipedia:Userboxes/Arts/Cinema is part of WikiProject Userboxes. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as part of the userboxes system. WikiProject Userboxes itself is an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles and templates related to the userbox system, used on many users' pages. We need all your help, so join in today!UserboxesWikipedia:WikiProject UserboxesTemplate:WikiProject UserboxesUserboxes articles

More Dark Knight

Could anyone make more Dark Knight userboxes? Maybe with the Joker and Two-Face? --CommanderWiki35 (talk) 00:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New boxes

I have created simple boxes for Alfred Hitchcock and Buster Keaton; they are on the new boxes page as well as my own page. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 17:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Man-eating talking plant template

The {{user LSOH}} template was not created in reference to the musical. If you want to create something specific to the 1986 musical, do so. But do not categorize my template as a reference to the musical, which it is not. Just look at the image in the template -- it's from the 1960 original, not the 1986 musical. (Ibaranoff24 04:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Repo Man/Harry Dean Stanton

REPO MAN

This user thinks the Rodriguez brothers are Goddamn Dipshit Gypsy Dildo Punks.

thought this would be funny, didn't see one involving repo man, so i'll put it on. Anyone have a problem, just remove it.

suggestion

film noir please ! Rohmerin 10:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question involving image

I have a design for a box concerning the film Titanic, however, I have not been able to find a suitable image. I have created one from a screenshot of the film, however, I was wondering whether or not it would conflict with Wikipedia's Free-Use policy if I uploaded it. The resolution is 64x64 pixels. The Good Ol' Country Doctor 19:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Did some research, found a better non-rule-violating way. Sorry for the distraction. The Good Ol' Country Doctor 20:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Organisation

I've done a fair bit of work improving the organisation of the list of specific films, as it was a bit of a mess with most of the films in a big long list while the Sci Fi section had more detail and a couple of individual films had sub-sections to themselves.

I've moved boxes to the correct genre heading, then created a few new genre headings. I named the original list 'general' so it would indent in line with the other categories. I then added sub-headings to each genre for any film with 3 or more boxes on the page (regardless of the 'notabillity' of the film). this seemed the most sensible criteria. However, I didn't go back and remove headings from existing films with less than three boxes.

With regards how I categorised films by genre, I just checked the linked wiki page for each and read what it said. If you disagree, please feel free to re-categorise as you see fit. Some are hard to pin down, e.g. should Jaws be in horror?

I've tried to put things in alphabetical order where I can, but haven't done all the sections. When I have some time I'll try and come back to that.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dances With Wolves

I think we need some DWW ones. I would make some, but I just joined today, and I don't know how to make them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arilicious (talk • contribs) 22:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]