Wikipedia talk:Transwiki log/Articles moved from here/en.wiktionary

Prod

I just went through everything that was still not struck from the beginning until the first section break Wikipedia:Transwiki_log/Articles_moved_from_here/en.wiktionary#Section_break. I found one article that was a potentially viable Wikipedia stub, so I left it alone but did a propose delete on the rest with on of these two tags as appropriate. Hopefully in a week there will be a bunch of red links. Jeepday 04:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:prod|This unreferenced article does not appear to meet [[WP:N|notability]] requirements see also [[WP:NOT#DICT]]}}

{{subst:prod|This unreferenced article does not appear to meet [[WP:N|notability]] requirements see also [[WP:NOT#DICT]], also it has been moved to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/furrier where it lives happily.}}

Javascript running amok

Hi!

This is the first time I've tried to use the "transwiki" process to move an article from Wikipedia into the Wiktionary. Loading this page blew my Firefox browser out of the water two times. I finally got the page to load by using Konqueror, which informed me that a piece of Javascript was in an infinite loop. So I told Konqueror to kill the Javascript, and I was finally able to add one log entry to this page.

I'm not sure where I really ought to report this problem, so thought I'd put a note in here, just in case somebody else is having similar difficulties. Oh – I'm running SuSE Linux 9.3 at the moment. DavidCBryant 16:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It loads fine under Internet Explorer, but it's an enormous page, the size is probably choking your web browser. --Xyzzyplugh 02:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs archiving

This page is getting quite long, should it be archived? Also, is the backlog tag still needed? I don't know if there's still anything left to be done with these entries, it appears that they have all been "dealt with" by the automated bots but I don't know if there's more to the process that still needs dealing with and that's why the backlog tag is still there. Anyways, maybe these same bots that look after this page could be programmed to also place/remove the backlog tag and archive the page. -- œ ^™ 20:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<Many of these have since become articles or redirects to articles. I will remove the backlog tag and add "historical". All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]