Wikipedia talk:Sensible Censorship

This is my first proposed policy so please do add or change the policy as you wish. I would much appreciate advice on how to create a good policy and how to improve for next time. UKWiki 19:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It needs some censorship to protect some contoversial topics from vandalism.

What censorship does Wikipedia need exactly? Gerard Foley 12:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry, this proposed policy is probably misleading. I am possibly getting censoring and moderating mixed up - for which I apologise. What I meant what some topics need moderating to make sure a NPOV is always put across, but not censoring to make sure no one is offended at all - for example there is no information about the suspected 2000 US presidental election irregularities, because everytime someone puts it on, it is taken off. These people are not saying that there were irregularities, just that many think there were.

I apologise once again for misleading anyone! UKWiki 15:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incompleteness

THis policy seems incomplete, at best, to me. Where are some defined do's or dont's? Copysan 01:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]