Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Proposed
This is the only hard part:
- Click on the red link, and copy and paste the following content onto the page: ==Mediation for NAME and NAME== Party one: USERNAME (talk · contribs) Party two: USERNAME (talk · contribs) ===Overview of dispute by party one=== Please limit discussion to 250 words or less. ===Overview of dispute by party two=== Please limit discussion to 250 words or less. ===Goals of mediation between the two parties=== Please state the goals you wish to achieve in this mediation.
Can you make this part easier to understand? Especially for newbies? Thanks! Uncle Ed 01:40, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
I don't see any reason for change, and dislike these
[edit]No offense intended, but I don't see the need for any of these changes, nor do I think the added structure is desirable. Mediation is a highly personal affair, and best handled without this kind of formalisation. The chair of MedCom should hand out cases, IMO, as they currently (should) do. --Improv 23:58, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
Delay and structure
[edit]Everyone is disappointed with the slow progress of Mediation at Wikipedia. I welcome any idea(s) which might speed things up.
We've tried all sorts of things, and I think it's only fair to give cello guy his chance.
I'm going to ask the Mediation Committee (via e-mail) to accept the two or three new Mediator applicants, and I'm going to work with the whole committee to find ways to streamline the process.
Mediation is indeed highly personal, so maybe reducing structure is the best thing. It's all about people anyway. Uncle Ed 12:05, September 9, 2005 (UTC)