Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:ROBO)

Good article reassessment for International Aerial Robotics Competition

[edit]

International Aerial Robotics Competition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for discussion

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 14:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drone redirects

[edit]

FYI, drone redirects are being discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24 -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Swarm Drone"

[edit]

Swarm Drone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) claims to be an India-only topic, and only a military aviation topic. Seems, a bit odd, since drone swarms are vastly used in advertising and artistic displays across the world, and espionage and military swarm drones exist outside of India. And there being swarms of non-aerial drones in research. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

[edit]

Hello,
Please note that Mechanism (engineering), which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Robotics conventions#Requested move 30 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Robert C. Michelson

[edit]

Robert C. Michelson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serve Robotics AfC Draft Review

[edit]

Hi there. I'm wondering if any editors at this WikiProject would be interested in reviewing my AfC draft for Serve Robotics. I was very careful to write in a neutral, encyclopedic style and only cite high-quality sources (e.g., TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Bloomberg, The Verge, and Quartz). The draft was immediately declined and I would appreciate a thoughtful assessment from editors familiar with the subject area (namely, robotics and technology), so that I'm updating the draft in the right way before trying again, as I don't want to keep hitting a brick wall and wasting editors' time.

To me, the "written like an advertisement" tag feels unwarranted and is something I really really tried to avoid... but maybe there's something I'm missing. I'd welcome feedback from others. I know I'm coming from a biased perspective as the comms head at Serve so I would appreciate help in creating a neutral article that's a contribution to the Wikipedia community. Thank you! ServeAduke (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Meta Platforms#Requested move 29 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 21:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on 15.ai

[edit]

There is an RFC at Talk:15.ai#RFC_on_Status_of_Web_Site on the status of the web site. Participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]