Jump to content

Talk:Line representations in robotics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Robotics conventions)

Attention needed

[edit]
  • Expand
  • Clarify definitions and applications in robotics
  • Examples ?

Chaosdruid (talk) 21:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 August 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Robotics conventionsLine representations in robotics – This article seems to be all about line representations and not as general as the title implies. Maybe rename to "Line representations in robotics"? RJFJR (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: First relist. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Robotics has been notified of this discussion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I approve of giving it this more specific name, but the article itself could use some better explanation, too. What is a "line representation" in robotics? Is this a line drawn on paper or imagined in space that a robot follows? Why is this important? - Brian Kendig (talk) 00:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support some move away from the current title, which could be misinterpreted as referring to conferences about robotics. I don't have enough familiarity with the field to suggest a good title (or evaluate whether the proposed title is suitable) but the closer should still pick something per WP:NOGOODOPTIONS. -- King of ♥ 17:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.