Wikipedia talk:Professional opinion-havers
Appearance
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Title
[edit]Hate to say it, but you've got too many hyphens – should be simply Wikipedia:Professional opinion-havers. It's the difference between a professional haver of opinions and a haver of professional opinions. (There are some hyphen–endash issues here as well, but they need not detain us.) EEng 00:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ah. Fair enough. GMGtalk 01:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just my professional opinion, of course. EEng 07:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done GMGtalk 14:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Also, for whatever it's worth "you are wrong" I believe is an Army-ism. As in "If you are not in formation you are wrong. Unfuck your soup sandwich or beat your face until you do." Translated: You should be in formation now. If you are not, then you should do so immediately or you should do push ups. GMGtalk 14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just my professional opinion, of course. EEng 07:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral - I don't have an opinion on this essay yet, but I want to leave this comment here just to let everyone know that I will have an opinion soon, so be on the lookout for it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
RfO
[edit]An editor has requested opinions from other editors about the opinions of other editors. Within 24 hours, this page will be added to all the lists. When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from some of the lists. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below. |
- Should we have opinions on having opinions?
Survey
[edit]- Ambivalent - I like how meta it is, but it might be too meta. GMGtalk 15:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)