Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Online Ambassadors/Apply

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Questions

[edit]

1. What happens if someone wishes to provide private feedback on a public request? sonia 02:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you should send a message to Online-ambassadors-en@lists.wikimedia.org, but I'd wait for Sage to confirm this. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's a good way to go. That one goes to the Online Ambassadors selection team.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 04:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


2. The "How to apply" section of this page contains the word "transclude". That's not too clever. I don't know what that means, and I don't want anyone to tell me. I want an ordinary word to be used. Jargon like this will be, I'm afraid, off-putting, and I'll wager good money that that's not the intention here. Tom Cloyd (talk) 03:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interim Application Process since there is no existing one.

[edit]

Ever since the dissolution of the Steering Committee, there has been no one responsible for receiving online ambassador applications. That is, with the advent of - and transition to - Education Working Group strategy there was a neglect to create a new process for online ambassador applications. At the first IRC meeting of the Working Group, received no objections to create a temporary solution. So here is what I am implementing instead, until there are objections.

Here are the changes I've made to make things run: Offline applictions are no longer allowed. Online applications occur by posting the questionaire on a new section on the page Wikipedia talk:Online Ambassadors. Online ambassadors are accepted once 2 endorsements are made on their application. Maximilianklein (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest, "Online ambassadors are accepted once their application has been open for at least 2 weeks, at least 2 votes in favor are made by other editors, and at least 66% of all votes are in favor." Pine 06:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]