Wikipedia talk:Non-Wikipedia disclaimers

Britannica removed content

THE SITE AND ALL INFORMATION, PRODUCTS, AND OTHER CONTENT (INCLUDING THIRD-PARTY INFORMATION, PRODUCTS, AND CONTENT) INCLUDED IN OR ACCESSIBLE FROM THIS SITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND (EXPRESS, IMPLIED, AND STATUTORY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF TITLE AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE), ALL OF WHICH BRITANNICA EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. YOUR USE OF BRITANNICA.COM IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. (noticed on January 13 that they have removed this section)

I re-inserted the text as it is of considerable historical interest, but marked it as obsolete. regards, High on a tree 14:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about WP:RS?

Including The New York Times and Wall Street Journal here kind of undermines our stamp of approval of those sources as the epitome of WP:RS compliance, does it not? -- œ ^™ 16:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

103.167.162.110 (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 21:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]