Wikipedia talk:Inflationary hypothesis of Wikipedia growth

What is 'sustainable growth' supposed to mean? It's sounds like one of those annoying self-contradictions that you hear in environmental discourse. Richard001 (talk) 03:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

This article is in the project namespace, but is written like a mainspace article. Should it be moved into the namespace? I would think not, since it is about wikipedia. Alternatively, it should be expanded and rewritten to become a useful project page, something I don't have the expertise to do. Can anyone else help? – Joe Nu tter 15:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Following your request and my diagnosis that this article was suffering from euphoria, I sedated the article. (I don't have the time to expand it.) Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 17:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disproven

One of the authors has been a redlink for a longgggggggggg time... Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]