Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Finance & Investment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
HomeDiscussionFeeds & open tasksRequestsAssessmentResourcesTemplatesParticipantsMailing listDrives

Good article reassessment for Chemical Bank

[edit]

Chemical Bank has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 14:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing for Vendor finance

[edit]

This stub has been unsourced for 15 years. Please help fix this. Bearian (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 December 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 02:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance and Investment – As this isn't a proper noun, per MOS:& it should use "and". Gonnym (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose move. There are over 20,000 pages associated with this WikiProject, all of which will bear the old WikiProject banner with an ampersand in them. The existing title is shorter and easier to add to talk pages. Given the project is inactive, I fail to see the point of the move as it is change for change's sake and serves no other useful purpose. I still use this project's banner when I encounter articles related to banking and finance fraud. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 18:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The project is not inactive and has several active users. As for the proposal, I can see the rational but I agree with CX Zoom that this does not have to follow WP:MOS and Cameron Drewe's comment about the use of the existing name on a lot of pages. If this was new project I would agree but I think we should leave the existing name unless somebody prepares a bulk replace tool to update all the existing talk pages. Sargdub (talk) 22:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leave it up to the Wikproject members which, per Sargdub, is still active. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.