Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/War of the Fifth Coalition/archive1

Article stats

FAC Nominator User:UberCryxic

Authorship stats

Dumelow 44.4%
UberCryxic 24.2%
Z1720 4.4%

Top editor stats

UberCryxic · 165 (31.7%)
Dumelow · 121 (23.3%)
Z1720 · 70 (13.5%)

Stats excerpted as of 6 December, 2021, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FASA nominations

Please set up separate sections for each nomination.

FASA nomination Dumelow

During the FAR process, Dumelow was providing new sources and information as well as responding to issues on the FAR. Z1720 (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nikkimaria there are two here ... Dumelow and Eddie891. Bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:08, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Dumelow

Support Z1720 (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thank you Dumelow, for this important save of the rusty bronze star. Dumelow's contribs to the article have now surpassed the original nominator, with over 40% of the authorship, and the second highest edit count. Dumelow can now proudly display the star associated with this article in userspace. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Gog. SN54129 — Review here please :) 16:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Victoria (tk) 21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FASA nomination Eddie891

During the FAR process, Eddie provided new sources and conducted copyediting to remove POV language. A sample of their edits is here Z1720 (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Eddie891

Support Z1720 (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~Neutral~~. I am a great fan of Eddie891's FA work, and recognize his significant help in saving this star, but we were unclear on consensus about the extent that FASA awards would extend in the initial proposal, and Eddie is unfortunately the first test case of an editor who is not the principle contributor, even though he made significant edits. For now, I am leaning towards not bestowing FASA awards for those who have less than about a fourth or fifth of the authorship of an article. Eddie is at number five in the article stats, with 4% of the authorship, and 5% of the edits (28). One question to me is, if this article had appeared at FAC, would Eddie891 have been listed as a co-nom, as I am trying to think in terms of who would be credited at WP:WBFAN with the star. I am willing to be convinced otherwise, and sorry that such a fine editor as Eddie is the test case, because we also seek to value contributions at FAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The FAR work at J. K. Rowling has convinced me to change my stance on this; at Rowling, there are at least three editors without whom the work could not progress but whose contributions do not rise to the level of a fourth of fifth of the authorship. Based on more experience, now I'm on board to bestow the FASA to both of the main contributors here. @Nikkimaria: SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Gog. SN54129 — Review here please :) 16:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Victoria (tk) 21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]