Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The King's Speech/archive1
Procedural note
[edit]Procedural note to nominator - just in case you missed it, you really shouldn't be striking through other peoples' comments per the instructions at the top of the FAC page. Would you mind unstriking? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed all the strike-throug--sorry I should have taken better note. What is the best practice for following the progress of a review? --I find they become a bit unwieldly. Should the nominator maintain a short summary at the end, as per this comment from SandyGeorgia, or is it the correct role for him at all? Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- You could add a short summary if you want, but they aren't really helpful unless a FAC is unusually long and convoluted, leading to the chance of a delegate missing something critical. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed all the strike-throug--sorry I should have taken better note. What is the best practice for following the progress of a review? --I find they become a bit unwieldly. Should the nominator maintain a short summary at the end, as per this comment from SandyGeorgia, or is it the correct role for him at all? Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)