Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Singapore strategy/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Addressed comments from Crisco 1492

[edit]
Lede
  • Don't know why, but "Such a fleet required a well-equipped base and Singapore was chosen as the most suitable location in 1919." bugs me. I think "and" may not be the best choice here.
  • "The Singapore strategy envisaged..." -- I'm assuming the planners of the Singapore strategy envisioned such a thing, and not the strategy itself.
  • " The idea of invading Japan was rejected as impractical. Nor did British naval planners expect that the Japanese would willingly fight a decisive battle against the odds." -- Starting with "nor" feels odd to me. Perhaps combine the two?
  • "However, they were aware of the impact of a blockade..." -- Is the however necessary?
Origins
  • "... the Royal Navy was already facing serious challenges to its position as the world's most powerful fleet from two of its former allies, the United States Navy..." - So were they no longer legally allies, or? To the best of my knowledge the US and UK were mutually supportive for most of the 20th century. Also, later on you have the alliance with Japan ending in 1921; if so, immediately after WWI Japan was technically still an ally, right?
  • Just a check; in AuE is it common to just say "Cabinet" or "Admiralty" without "the" in front? Note that you have "the Treasury" later.
Plans
Base development
Australia
Outcome
Aftermath
  • "... which was ordered to Malaya in January" - Perhaps "had been"?
  • "Joint Planning Staff" - Worth a redlink?
  • "The Joint Planning Staff considered the matter, and recommended that no inquiry be held, as it would not be possible to restrict its focus to the events surrounding the fall of Singapore, and it would inevitably have to examine the political, diplomatic and military circumstances of the Singapore strategy over a period of many years." -- Fairly long sentence, perhaps it should be split or trimmed
  • Should we have wikilinks in that long quote?